terratogen wrote:
] inignoct wrote:
] ] terratogen wrote:
] ] ] inignoct wrote:
] ] ] ]sweet lord, she better not.
] ] ]
] ] ] Between her and Bush... Choice.. It's supposed to be a
] good
] ]
] ] ] thing, right?
] ]
] ] well, that assumes that she's the most likely candidate to
] ] beat bush. i'm not so sure... she's still seen negatively
] by
] ] a lot of people and unless she can motivate *all* the female
]
] ] voters, i'm unconvinced that she's the best choice. but, my
]
] ] primary issue with it is that after saying many, many times
] ] that she wouldn't run, doing so now would demolish her
] ] credibility, not to mention undermine the party. the more a
]
] ] candidate says one thing and does another, the less i'm
] going
] ] to like them.
] ]
] ] that being said, if she decides to run, and wins the
] primary,
] ] i'll certainly vote for her, but i won't be as happy about
] it.
]
] All I have to say, is that I voted for Nader last time...None
] of this is my fault. We've been stuck in a one party system
] with two factions for far too long.

heh, yeah. i voted for nader too. i strongly agree that there's not enough diversity of stance taken into account in our system. in the last election, i voted with my ethics for the person i most agreed with, regardless of his ability to win.

however, given what the Bush administration has done to this country and the world, i can no longer comfortably do so. My philosophical ideals must come second to helping ensure that we don't suffer through four more years of bush. given that i live in georgia, i'm not sure it's likely to matter, of course.

anyway, everyone's gotta choose their own road, and i know who i support at this point in the rece, but i also know that i'll be voting for whichever candidate is best positioned to beat bush, regardless of other factors.

RE: Daily Kos: Is Hillary running?