inignoct wrote:
] terratogen wrote:
] ] inignoct wrote:
] ] ]sweet lord, she better not.
] ]
] ] Between her and Bush... Choice.. It's supposed to be a good
]
] ] thing, right?
]
] well, that assumes that she's the most likely candidate to
] beat bush. i'm not so sure... she's still seen negatively by
] a lot of people and unless she can motivate *all* the female
] voters, i'm unconvinced that she's the best choice. but, my
] primary issue with it is that after saying many, many times
] that she wouldn't run, doing so now would demolish her
] credibility, not to mention undermine the party. the more a
] candidate says one thing and does another, the less i'm going
] to like them.
]
] that being said, if she decides to run, and wins the primary,
] i'll certainly vote for her, but i won't be as happy about it.

All I have to say, is that I voted for Nader last time...None of this is my fault. We've been stuck in a one party system with two factions for far too long.

RE: Daily Kos: Is Hillary running?