] Recent election problems have sparked great interest in ] managing the election process through the use of ] electronic voting systems. While computer scientists, for ] the most part, have been warning of the perils of such ] action, vendors have forged ahead with their products, ] claiming increased security and reliability. Many ] municipalities have adopted electronic systems, and the ] number of deployed systems is rising. For these new ] computerized voting systems, neither source code nor the ] results of any third-party certification analyses have ] been available for the general population to study, ] because vendors claim that secrecy is a necessary ] requirement to keep their systems secure. Recently, ] however, the source code purporting to be the software ] for a voting system from a major manufacturer appeared on ] the Internet. This manufacturer's systems were used in ] Georgia's state-wide elections in 2002, and the company ] just announced that the state of Maryland awarded them an ] order valued at up to $55.6 million to deliver touch ] screen voting systems. The press claims this paper is discredited because Avi Rubin was involved with an electronic voting company. Read it for yourself and see what you think. |