Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

MemeStreams Discussion

search


This page contains all of the posts and discussion on MemeStreams referencing the following web page: On the risk posed by abuses of the DMCA. You can find discussions on MemeStreams as you surf the web, even if you aren't a MemeStreams member, using the Threads Bookmarklet.

On the risk posed by abuses of the DMCA
by Decius at 11:57 pm EDT, Oct 13, 2009

"Thinking aloud is a habit responsible for much of mankind's misery."

- "Benjamin Franklin" in HBO's John Adams

A prerequisite for free political discourse is that people feel like they can get up in the morning and throw some thoughts out on the public Internet on their way out the door to work and right or wrong the worst thing they might expect is a reply from someone who disagrees with them.

If we are to have intellectual property rights there must be a process for removing infringing content, but that process must be precisely applied and carefully limited, least it become a tool for over-broad acts of retaliation and censorship through intimidation.

If our legal system provides a mechanism for retaliation against disfavored opinions and our culture approves of its use, if people are made to feel that some day, when they least expect it, something they wrote on a personal blog might get them in real trouble, the whole public sphere will be diminished, and our democracy with it.


 
RE: On the risk posed by abuses of the DMCA
by flynn23 at 12:55 am EDT, Oct 14, 2009

Decius wrote:
"Thinking aloud is a habit responsible for much of mankind's misery."

- "Benjamin Franklin" in HBO's John Adams

A prerequisite for free political discourse is that people feel like they can get up in the morning and throw some thoughts out on the public Internet on their way out the door to work and right or wrong the worst thing they might expect is a reply from someone who disagrees with them.

If we are to have intellectual property rights there must be a process for removing infringing content, but that process must be precisely applied and carefully limited, least it become a tool for over-broad acts of retaliation and censorship through intimidation.

If our legal system provides a mechanism for retaliation against disfavored opinions and our culture approves of its use, if people are made to feel that some day, when they least expect it, something they wrote on a personal blog might get them in real trouble, the whole public sphere will be diminished, and our democracy with it.

You're acting like this "democracy" and culture that you speak of is real. It's a sham. Sure, there's more liberty of thought and pursuit of interests than previously, but let's get one thing straight. You are not free. You are just organized in a way to provide benefit to others while lulling you into a false sense of self-will and relative comfort. Simply trying to do anything even remotely contrary shows you that pretty quickly. And now you get labeled a "terrorist" or "radical" with dire consequences. You, as a [former] hacker, should know that.

Sheesh... I'm starting to sound like Johnny X. =\


 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics