Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

MemeStreams Discussion

search


This page contains all of the posts and discussion on MemeStreams referencing the following web page: IAB Concerns Regarding Internet Research and Evolution. You can find discussions on MemeStreams as you surf the web, even if you aren't a MemeStreams member, using the Threads Bookmarklet.

IAB Concerns Regarding Internet Research and Evolution
by Jeremy at 1:54 am EST, Feb 25, 2003

This document discusses IAB concerns that ongoing research is needed to further the evolution of the Internet infrastructure, and that consistent, sufficient non-commercial funding is needed to enable such research.

... Current funding levels for Internet research are not generally adequate, and several important research areas are significantly underfunded. This situation needs to be rectified for the Internet to continue its evolution and development.

... if commercial funding is the main source of funding for future Internet research, the future of the Internet infrastructure could be in trouble.

... for most of the topics in this document, relying solely on commercially-funded research would not be adequate.

... The net result of reduced U.S. Government funding and profit-focused, low-risk, short-term industry funding has been a sharp decline in higher-risk but more innovative research activities. Industry has also been less interested in research to evolve the overall Internet architecture.

... The DNS system, while it works well given its current constraints, has several stress points.

As network size, link bandwidth, CPU capacity, and the number of users all increase, research will be needed to ensure that the Internet of the future scales to meet these increasing demands.


IAB Concerns Regarding Internet Research and Evolution
by bucy at 10:51 am EST, Feb 26, 2003

This document discusses IAB concerns that ongoing research is needed to further the evolution of the Internet infrastructure, and that consistent, sufficient non-commercial funding is needed to enable such research.

This is a really cool ID ... and puts a finger on a trend that I've been vaguely aware of that the IETF seems to be spending more and more time designing SNMP MIBs and less time on fundamentals.

My boss (director of a lab at CMU) made a remark a few months ago
that sums up the problem: "Why should we work this if industry
can do it?" Academics are simply not interested in building
practical systems! They want to push the limits of the design space. They want to build something that is information-theoretically secure and completely useless in practice.

But industry doesn't seem to be able to do it either: they are
too often brain-damaged by a bean-counting, 6-month-returns mindset.

I would work on this stuff full-time if someone would pay me to do it but noone will since I don't have a PhD and if I did, I probably wouldn't want to anymore!


There is a redundant post from Decius not displayed in this view.
 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics