|
Palin's comment on science research.... by Dr. Nanochick at 11:57 am EDT, Oct 28, 2008 |
Bahahaha....not very smart Palin (not that I think many scientists were going to support you anyway, but...) |
|
RE: Palin's comment on science research.... by janelane at 3:47 pm EDT, Oct 28, 2008 |
Nanochick wrote: Bahahaha....not very smart Palin (not that I think many scientists were going to support you anyway, but...)
Again from the Republican playbook, she's too stupid to realize how interrelated science is and instead uses buzz words to pander to the right. The subtext is that scientists and government are elitist and out of touch with "real people", but yet it takes a great deal of education to do genetic research. Again, something she doesn't comprehend. I try not to demonize the Republican party, but it's hard when they're so...demonic. -janelane |
|
Palin's comment on science research.... by Decius at 1:50 pm EDT, Oct 28, 2008 |
Harping on Palin's gaffes is getting old, but this one is worth a look because it seems to contradict claims made by the McCain campaign that they are not opposed to funding increases for scientific research. Apparently McCain has also used scientific research in campaign ads about government pork. Christopher Hitchens does not mince words: This is what the Republican Party has done to us this year: It has placed within reach of the Oval Office a woman who is a religious fanatic and a proud, boastful ignoramus. Those who despise science and learning are not anti-elitist. They are morally and intellectually slothful people who are secretly envious of the educated and the cultured. And those who prate of spiritual warfare and demons are not just "people of faith" but theocratic bullies. On Nov. 4, anyone who cares for the Constitution has a clear duty to repudiate this wickedness and stupidity.
Will they still let him on Fox after that? |
|
RE: Palin's comment on science research.... by noteworthy at 8:08 pm EDT, Oct 28, 2008 |
Decius wrote: Harping on Palin's gaffes is getting old, but this one is worth a look ...
First: what everyone else said. But I disagree with the view that she committed a "gaffe" here. She said exactly what she intended to say. There was no slip of the tongue here. By all indications of the video, she was making prepared remarks. It was fully her intention to present herself as disdainful of "scientists" who would rather study "fruit flies (!!??)" -- in "France", no less! -- than actual humans (your loved ones!) who are really suffering (I feel your pain!). Clearly, her comment betrays her ignorance (and, more damagingly, her insolence) to the scientifically minded public. Of course this is not something she's particularly concerned about, since as Nanochick's comment suggests, the McCain/Palin ticket long ago lost any hope of earning the scientist's vote. Their strategies are motivated by superficial emotional pandering, not by rational, well-reasoned argument. Considering the present situation, it's doubtful whether this comment caused any of Palin's remaining supporters to change their mind, turn away, and decide to vote for Obama/Biden. And it's conceivable that her comment, by conveying the (factually invalid but emtionally truthy) impression that she Cares About Them, still managed to secure the votes of some people in her target audience. Ultimately it matters little to the vote that these tactics lead Obama's supporters to lose more respect for her. Respect is like an unsigned value. Once it reaches zero, you can't have any less of it. For McCain/Palin, the days of inclusive outreach are long gone. At this point it's about trying to minimize further defections. The weapons of choice are fear, uncertainty, and doubt. |
|
| |
RE: Palin's comment on science research.... by Decius at 11:20 am EDT, Oct 29, 2008 |
But I disagree with the view that she committed a "gaffe" here. She said exactly what she intended to say. There was no slip of the tongue here.
Perhaps I frequently think thats the case with things called gaffes. They meant it. They just didn't realize it was a stupid thing to say. The fact that Palin's ignorance is willful doesn't mean it isn't genuine. Considering the present situation, it's doubtful whether this comment caused any of Palin's remaining supporters to change their mind, turn away, and decide to vote for Obama/Biden.
"There are still people hanging on by their fingernails who need to be moved into the sell column," said Michael Farr, president of the Washington money-management firm Farr, Miller & Washington. |
|
Palin's comment on science research.... by I Love Lamp at 5:55 pm EDT, Oct 28, 2008 |
Bahahaha....not very smart Palin (not that I think many scientists were going to support you anyway, but...)
It appears she's running on the 'I Love Lamp' policy. I smell nothing but success for this brilliant woman. Ron: 'Brick, do you actually love that lamp, or are you just saying that because it's in the room'
Brick: 'I love lamp'
|
There is a redundant post from ubernoir not displayed in this view.
|
|