] Bigend contends that ''the creative process is no longer ] contained within an individual skull, if indeed it ever ] was. Everything, today, is to some extent the reflection of ] something else. I have at home a copy of the Thomas Cleary translation of the 'Avatamsaka Sutra', a scripture of awesome beauty and complexity and scope. Although it's original author is unknown, the Avatamsaka Sutra is thought to have been written in the first or second century of the Common Era. In the Avatamsaka I have found several examples of recursive imagery as well as precise definitions of truly huge numbers. The above quote brings the Sutra to mind in that the sutra is self reflective: that is to say that some of the smaller passages reflect the work as a whole. Consider the 'net of indra' image: reality is compared to a vast net. At each node is a jewel in which is reflected each and every other jewel in the net and in each reflection... Far away in the heavenly abode of the great god indra, there is a wonderful net which has been hung by some cunning artificer in such a manner that it stretches out indefinitely in all directions. In accordance with the extravagant tastes of deities, the artificer has hung a single glittering jewel at the net's every node, and since the net itself is infinite in dimension, the jewels are infinite in number. There hang the jewels, glittering like stars of the first magnitude, a wonderful sight to behold. If we now arbitrarily select one of these jewels for inspection and look closely at it, we will discover that in its polished surface there are reflected all the other jewels in the net, infinite in number. Not only that, but each of the jewels reflected in this one jewel is also reflecting all the other jewels, so that the process of reflection is infinite. Definitely worth a read, even if you are not a Buddhist. RE: 'Pattern Recognition': The Coolhunter |