Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

MemeStreams Discussion

search


This page contains all of the posts and discussion on MemeStreams referencing the following web page: Storing information in DNA. You can find discussions on MemeStreams as you surf the web, even if you aren't a MemeStreams member, using the Threads Bookmarklet.

Storing information in DNA
by Decius at 12:47 pm EST, Jan 8, 2003

] "A message encoded as artificial DNA can be stored within
] the genomes of multiplying bacteria and then accurately
] retrieved, US scientists have shown.
]
] Their concern that all current ways of storing information,
] from paper to electronic memory, can easily be lost or
] destroyed prompted them to devise a new type of memory -
] within living organisms.
]
] "A big concern is the protection of valuable information in
] the case of a nuclear catastrophe," says information
] technologist Pak Chung Wong, of the Pacific Northwest
] National Laboratory in Washington State. The laboratory was
] set up as a nuclear energy research institute."

Hrm. I have a hard time buying the idea that this is really going to be useful in a nuclear catastrophe. However, these bacteria would make for one hell of a covert channel. Of course, the encoding/decoding process would have to be as automatic as possible, but imagine smuggling secrets in your belly button.

I still maintain that it is feasible that our own DNA already has messages encoded in it and the SETI people need to get to work on decoding it. :)


 
RE: Storing information in DNA
by Dr. Nanochick at 3:06 pm EST, Jan 8, 2003

Decius wrote:
] ] "A message encoded as artificial DNA can be stored within
] ] the genomes of multiplying bacteria and then accurately
] ] retrieved, US scientists have shown.
] ]
] ] Their concern that all current ways of storing information,
]
] ] from paper to electronic memory, can easily be lost or
] ] destroyed prompted them to devise a new type of memory -
] ] within living organisms.
] ]
] ] "A big concern is the protection of valuable information in
]
] ] the case of a nuclear catastrophe," says information
] ] technologist Pak Chung Wong, of the Pacific Northwest
] ] National Laboratory in Washington State. The laboratory was
]
] ] set up as a nuclear energy research institute."
]
] Hrm. I have a hard time buying the idea that this is really
] going to be useful in a nuclear catastrophe. However, these
] bacteria would make for one hell of a covert channel. Of
] course, the encoding/decoding process would have to be as
] automatic as possible, but imagine smuggling secrets in your
] belly button.
]
] I still maintain that it is feasible that our own DNA already
] has messages encoded in it and the SETI people need to get to
] work on decoding it. :)

So, the big concern is nuclear catastrophe? Does this mean that we need to start researching storage of info in the genomes of cochroaches?:)


 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics