|
This page contains all of the posts and discussion on MemeStreams referencing the following web page: Storing information in DNA. You can find discussions on MemeStreams as you surf the web, even if you aren't a MemeStreams member, using the Threads Bookmarklet.
|
Storing information in DNA by Decius at 12:47 pm EST, Jan 8, 2003 |
] "A message encoded as artificial DNA can be stored within ] the genomes of multiplying bacteria and then accurately ] retrieved, US scientists have shown. ] ] Their concern that all current ways of storing information, ] from paper to electronic memory, can easily be lost or ] destroyed prompted them to devise a new type of memory - ] within living organisms. ] ] "A big concern is the protection of valuable information in ] the case of a nuclear catastrophe," says information ] technologist Pak Chung Wong, of the Pacific Northwest ] National Laboratory in Washington State. The laboratory was ] set up as a nuclear energy research institute." Hrm. I have a hard time buying the idea that this is really going to be useful in a nuclear catastrophe. However, these bacteria would make for one hell of a covert channel. Of course, the encoding/decoding process would have to be as automatic as possible, but imagine smuggling secrets in your belly button. I still maintain that it is feasible that our own DNA already has messages encoded in it and the SETI people need to get to work on decoding it. :) |
|
RE: Storing information in DNA by Dr. Nanochick at 3:06 pm EST, Jan 8, 2003 |
Decius wrote: ] ] "A message encoded as artificial DNA can be stored within ] ] the genomes of multiplying bacteria and then accurately ] ] retrieved, US scientists have shown. ] ] ] ] Their concern that all current ways of storing information, ] ] ] from paper to electronic memory, can easily be lost or ] ] destroyed prompted them to devise a new type of memory - ] ] within living organisms. ] ] ] ] "A big concern is the protection of valuable information in ] ] ] the case of a nuclear catastrophe," says information ] ] technologist Pak Chung Wong, of the Pacific Northwest ] ] National Laboratory in Washington State. The laboratory was ] ] ] set up as a nuclear energy research institute." ] ] Hrm. I have a hard time buying the idea that this is really ] going to be useful in a nuclear catastrophe. However, these ] bacteria would make for one hell of a covert channel. Of ] course, the encoding/decoding process would have to be as ] automatic as possible, but imagine smuggling secrets in your ] belly button. ] ] I still maintain that it is feasible that our own DNA already ] has messages encoded in it and the SETI people need to get to ] work on decoding it. :) So, the big concern is nuclear catastrophe? Does this mean that we need to start researching storage of info in the genomes of cochroaches?:) |
|
|
|