| |
|
This page contains all of the posts and discussion on MemeStreams referencing the following web page: Dave Aitel: "Haberdashery!". You can find discussions on MemeStreams as you surf the web, even if you aren't a MemeStreams member, using the Threads Bookmarklet.
|
Dave Aitel: "Haberdashery!"
by Acidus at 10:35 am EDT, May 27, 2008 |
An exploit in standard parlance is a program that can get control of another program, not just crash it. Crashing a program is known as producing a proof-of-concept. It's the difference between screaming "Haberdashery!" at someone until they go away and convincing them with reasoned argument.
Move over dancery and hateration. Thanks to Dave, I'm adding "Haberdashery!" to my general vocabulary. |
| |
RE: Dave Aitel: 'Haberdashery!'
by Decius at 2:43 pm EDT, May 27, 2008 |
Acidus wrote: An exploit in standard parlance is a program that can get control of another program, not just crash it. Crashing a program is known as producing a proof-of-concept. It's the difference between screaming "Haberdashery!" at someone until they go away and convincing them with reasoned argument.
Move over dancery and hateration. Thanks to Dave, I'm adding "Haberdashery!" to my general vocabulary.
Thanks for posting this article. I blogged an analysis of this paper back in April here and here, which was posted here. I also enjoyed Halvar's take here. |
|
Dave Aitel: "Haberdashery!"
by I Love Lamp at 11:09 am EDT, May 27, 2008 |
An exploit in standard parlance is a program that can get control of another program, not just crash it. Crashing a program is known as producing a proof-of-concept. It's the difference between screaming "Haberdashery!" at someone until they go away and convincing them with reasoned argument.
Move over dancery and hateration. Thanks to Dave, I'm adding "Haberdashery!" to my general vocabulary. This is basically what I had to say about this paper the day it came out. I'm glad something like this has finally made its way to the likes of SecurityFocus.
|
|
|
