I'm just shocked they think they can do this without getting sued by web publishers. Without implicit consent, there's a pretty good chance they're going to be tampering with other people's copyrighted content without their permission. ...people who might object strenuously to having ads inserted into their pages for various reasons which might actually be contractual or organizational obligations.

I know if I hear someone pulled up the Dropline wiki and found a bunch of ads (or even one) on it, I'm going to be pretty likely to cost whoever did it a little money by calling up said organization and seeing if I can make a stranger cry and possibly quit her job.

RE: Charter fucks with DNS