Decius wrote: Mike the Usurper wrote: "I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president we will attack Iran," Clinton said.
Hillary, you have now demonstrated your utter unfitness to become the next president.
Do you support Obama?
Of the people left, choice 1 is Obama, choice 2 is probably McCain, but I'd put either Ron Paul or Mike Gravel ahead of Hillary. I don't like McCain's positions, but I know where he stands and why he's there. Hillary has put her own personal agenda above that of both her country and party. She's executing a scorched earth campaign where if she doesn't get the nomination, whoever does will lose so she can run again in 2012. As they say, that's no way to run a railroad. And having seen her full comment now, this was in reference to a theoretical attack by the Iranians on Israel, I stand by that assessment. Israel is not the 51st state, and an attack on them is not now, nor has it ever been, an attack on the US. Hillary also makes the stupid assumption that we'll be able to see on radar a nice ballistic track running from Tehran to Tel Aviv right before it vanishes. Wrong, on so many levels. RE: ABC News: Clinton on Iran Attack: 'We Would Be Able to Totally Obliterate Them' |