possibly noteworthy wrote:

A large and growing burden on the nation’s economy, traffic congestion arises for various reasons, and more than one mechanism is needed to combat it. It is most unlikely, however, that serious inroads to address the problem will be made without fundamental reform in the way consumers are charged for their use of congested highways. Congestion prices are tolls that reflect the economic costs of congestion, including productivity losses from traffic delays, increased accidents, higher emissions, and more. Such prices would help reduce these economic costs, and guide transportation investment resources to their highest and best use—which would include a better balance between highway and transit investment. In addition, such prices would generate revenues to help finance new investment and compensate low-income people and others for whom toll payments are especially burdensome. Requiring federal, state, and local engagement, such reform is a necessary step in the development of an effective, efficient, and sustainable highway system for the twenty-first century.

Jesus Christ, man. The term "noteworthy" has certain connotations in our society. Two of those connotations relate to brevity and importance. You see, if something is very important and a lot can be said on the subject, then something is "historic." If it is of minor importance and doesn't need more than a footnote on the pages of history, then it is "noteworthy." This thing you posted required too much goddam reading to ascertain a point. Shame on you for being so freaking verbose. Keep it simple, pretend you're in advertising when you post something here, dumbass.

RE: America’s Traffic Congestion Problem: Toward a Framework for Nationwide Reform