|
Don Kerr, on Anonymity and Privacy by noteworthy at 6:38 am EST, Nov 13, 2007 |
Transcript of remarks and Q&A by the Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence, Dr. Donald Kerr, at the 2007 GEOINT Symposium, an event sponsored by the United States Geospatial Intelligence Foundation. Too often, privacy has been equated with anonymity; and it’s an idea that is deeply rooted in American culture. The Lone Ranger wore a mask but Tonto didn’t seem to need one even though he did the dirty work for free. You’d think he would probably need one even more. But in our interconnected and wireless world, anonymity – or the appearance of anonymity – is quickly becoming a thing of the past. Protecting anonymity isn’t a fight that can be won. Anyone that’s typed in their name on Google understands that. Instead, privacy, I would offer, is a system of laws, rules, and customs with an infrastructure of Inspectors General, oversight committees, and privacy boards on which our intelligence community commitment is based and measured. And it is that framework that we need to grow and nourish and adjust as our cultures change.
|
|
RE: Don Kerr, on Anonymity and Privacy by Decius at 9:23 am EST, Nov 13, 2007 |
noteworthy wrote:
Transcript of remarks and Q&A by the Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence, Dr. Donald Kerr, at the 2007 GEOINT Symposium, an event sponsored by the United States Geospatial Intelligence Foundation. Too often, privacy has been equated with anonymity; and it’s an idea that is deeply rooted in American culture. The Lone Ranger wore a mask but Tonto didn’t seem to need one even though he did the dirty work for free. You’d think he would probably need one even more. But in our interconnected and wireless world, anonymity – or the appearance of anonymity – is quickly becoming a thing of the past. Protecting anonymity isn’t a fight that can be won. Anyone that’s typed in their name on Google understands that. Instead, privacy, I would offer, is a system of laws, rules, and customs with an infrastructure of Inspectors General, oversight committees, and privacy boards on which our intelligence community commitment is based and measured. And it is that framework that we need to grow and nourish and adjust as our cultures change.
Note my comment on this here. |
|
|
|