Mike the Usurper wrote:
Saying people on the other side of the issue don't get money though is baloney. Distracting the topic, with something clearly disprovable (and disproven) is grand theft oxygen, and we want it back so we can get on with a discussion of how to actually fix the problem.

How can an example of funding that is presented specifically as part of an agenda driven lie be used as evidence that serious scientists who don't share this consensus view can get funding for their research from serious funding sources? My point is that pointing at exxon is the exception that proves the rule. If people who don't share this consensus view have to turn to dishonest politically motivated organizations in order to fund their research, then obviously he is correct that they have been ostracized from the mainstream scientific community and they are unable to get normal grants for their work.

RE: Gore Gets A Cold Shoulder