Mike the Usurper wrote:

Please also note they mention they then did the reverse version with the W showing up the majority of the time and then they didn't hit the button when they should have have. Either way, I stick by the screw up statement. They're reacting incorrectly in either case.

Not to belabor something i think is pointless, but I disagree with your interpretation. The article says

Researchers got the same results when they repeated the experiment in reverse, asking another set of participants to tap when a W appeared.

Unless the writer is very sloppy, "same result" refers to the habituation evidenced by the "conservative" groups. That is, in the reverse case, they didn't not press W, they merely also pressed when it was M. So why W and M. Why not A and Q? Repeat this experiment with a bunch of other letters, and for that matter, with other symbols, and I'll start taking it more seriously.

Again, I'm no neuroscientist, and i have no love for the kind of conservatism that is popular today (which is to say, not really conservatism at all, as i understand it), but this thing proves little, if anything, and even if it is accurate in it's small way, does more harm than good if pressed too much.

In short, I don't give a fuck how their brains are wired, I oppose them on the logic of my position and the fallacy of their own. Stuff like this undermines the notion of logical opposition by reducing the debate to some kind of determinism.

RE: Study finds left-wing brain, right-wing brain - Los Angeles Times