| |
Corker FUD on Matthew Shepard Act...
by unmanaged at 11:16 am EDT, Jun 21, 2007 |
June 21, 2007 Dear Mr. Groce, Thank you for taking the time to contact my office to share your concerns about S. 1105, the upcoming hate crimes legislation. Your input is important to me, and I appreciate the time you took to share your thoughts. As you know, S.1105 was introduced in the Senate on April 12, 2007. This bill has been referred to the Senate Committee on the Judiciary. If S. 1105 should come before the Senate for a vote, I will not support it.
Thank you again for your letter. I hope you will continue to share your thoughts with me over the next six years. Sincerely, Bob Corker
United States Senator
Seems to me that these 2 day a week, piles of puke dont have the best interests our country in mind. Looks like another person who supports violence and inequality, FYI Republican Party... |
| |
RE: Corker FUD on Matthew Shepard Act...
by dc0de at 7:59 pm EDT, Jun 22, 2007 |
unmanaged wrote: June 21, 2007 Dear Mr. Groce, Thank you for taking the time to contact my office to share your concerns about S. 1105, the upcoming hate crimes legislation. Your input is important to me, and I appreciate the time you took to share your thoughts. As you know, S.1105 was introduced in the Senate on April 12, 2007. This bill has been referred to the Senate Committee on the Judiciary. If S. 1105 should come before the Senate for a vote, I will not support it.
Thank you again for your letter. I hope you will continue to share your thoughts with me over the next six years. Sincerely, Bob Corker
United States Senator
Seems to me that these 2 day a week, piles of puke dont have the best interests our country in mind. Looks like another person who supports violence and inequality, FYI Republican Party...
Sorry, I'm not a republican, but having just finished reading the text of the proposed law, doesn't really do anything to help, but would instead enable lawyers to continue to make new defenses for "perceived" offenses under the law. I actually agree that this law is poorly written, and should NOT be passed. Read it for yourself here: http://thomas.loc.gov/home/gpoxmlc110/h1592_rfs.xml We don't need more laws for hate crimes, we need the death penalty back. If you kill someone, REGARDLESS of the reason, you should die too, and do it with Texas's motto, with an express lane. If you think about murder, what part of it isn't a hate crime? We already have this covered, no? |
|
| | |
RE: Corker FUD on Matthew Shepard Act...
by unmanaged at 11:52 am EDT, Jun 26, 2007 |
dc0de wrote: unmanaged wrote: June 21, 2007 Dear Mr. Groce, Thank you for taking the time to contact my office to share your concerns about S. 1105, the upcoming hate crimes legislation. Your input is important to me, and I appreciate the time you took to share your thoughts. As you know, S.1105 was introduced in the Senate on April 12, 2007. This bill has been referred to the Senate Committee on the Judiciary. If S. 1105 should come before the Senate for a vote, I will not support it.
Thank you again for your letter. I hope you will continue to share your thoughts with me over the next six years. Sincerely, Bob Corker
United States Senator
Seems to me that these 2 day a week, piles of puke dont have the best interests our country in mind. Looks like another person who supports violence and inequality, FYI Republican Party...
Sorry, I'm not a republican, but having just finished reading the text of the proposed law, doesn't really do anything to help, but would instead enable lawyers to continue to make new defenses for "perceived" offenses under the law. I actually agree that this law is poorly written, and should NOT be passed. Read it for yourself here: http://thomas.loc.gov/home/gpoxmlc110/h1592_rfs.xml We don't need more laws for hate crimes, we need the death penalty back. If you kill someone, REGARDLESS of the reason, you should die too, and do it with Texas's motto, with an express lane. If you think about murder, what part of it isn't a hate crime? We already have this covered, no?
good point |
|
|
|
