Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

MemeStreams Discussion

search


This page contains all of the posts and discussion on MemeStreams referencing the following web page: I Will Live In A Very Quiet World (from Redditch Advertiser). You can find discussions on MemeStreams as you surf the web, even if you aren't a MemeStreams member, using the Threads Bookmarklet.

I Will Live In A Very Quiet World (from Redditch Advertiser)
by unmanaged at 10:25 pm EDT, Jun 11, 2007

‘I will live in a very quiet world’
By David Searle
Robin Wood and the aerials that neighbours have complained about.
Robin Wood and the aerials that neighbours have complained about.

A BLIND amateur radio ham fears he may lose his contact with the outside world if he is given an antisocial behaviour order over the aerials he keeps in his garden.

Robin Wood, 61, of Ombersley Close, Woodrow, is a licensed amateur radio operator who has had aerials in his garden for 15 years.

But after a visit from an ASBO officer, Redditch Council wants to reduce the size of the aerials, meaning he will no longer be able to communicate with his friends around the world.

"I'm blind and the radio is the only way I can communicate with the outside world. I use the radio as my social life," said Mr Wood.

"I'm not prepared to lose my quality of life. I feel threatened when I go outside and haven't been out on my own for 15 years.

"I can't watch the TV either - without my radio, I will live in a very quiet world."
advertisement

Mr Wood uses the radio to keep in touch with friends from as far afield as New York, Australia and Canada but the reduced sized aerials would not be able to transmit that far.

"The council just won't listen to me. They won't find anyone technically competent enough who can tell me exactly what the problem is and exactly what I have to take down and why I have to do it.

"They've threatened me with court if I don't take them down. I speak to them but they don't take anything on board," said Mr Wood.

Mr Wood's wife June said: "When you think of ASBOs, you think of young delinquents, not a 61-year-old man."

Mr Wood is now involved in talks with lawyers about the steps he can take to keep his aerials the same size.

A council spokesman said: "Residents are concerned about the visual impact of this resident's aerials, the radio interference they are experiencing and the nuisance this is causing them.

"Following legal advice, we're working with the resident and the relevant organisations involved to come to a solution that meets the needs of all parties."

This is bullshit.... Hams here in the US are required to take the steps to reduce and/or eliminate interference and I am sure it is the same in the UK.... Someone has a beef with someone and they bend the laws to take them out....

Just like the DoD jumps on hams on the coasts for the interference to PAVE/PAWS radar... but why is it now a problem? I can not seem to find out why?

see link http://www.eham.net/articles/16786

*update*

"Let's see if I understand this: The Anti Social Behavior Officer is wanting to remove the primary social outlet of an individual because of neighbors who are not very sociable. OK, I thing I have it. The antisocials are upset that he is being sociable. The Anti Social Behavior Officer is trying to enforce antisocial Behavior."


 
RE: I Will Live In A Very Quiet World (from Redditch Advertiser)
by Catonic at 8:29 am EDT, Jun 12, 2007

unmanaged wrote:

A council spokesman said: "Residents are concerned about the visual impact of this resident's aerials, the radio interference they are experiencing and the nuisance this is causing them.

"Following legal advice, we're working with the resident and the relevant organisations involved to come to a solution that meets the needs of all parties."

This is bullshit.... Hams here in the US are required to take the steps to reduce and/or eliminate interference and I am sure it is the same in the UK.... Someone has a beef with someone and they bend the laws to take them out....

Right, because forcing people to have antennas closer to the ground causes less interference, and that's a statistically proven solution.

It's precisely the reason that broadcasters go to such lengths to build great towers to hurtle the signal out into the aether when they could just as easily dump 50,000 watts onto the deck at 125 feet above ground and nucleate little Fifi and every object in a 25 mile radius... (as an aside, I learned of a TV station that did exactly that, and thirty years later the chief engineer has cancer).

Someone give the poor schmuck a balloon and some Litz wire, please? Maybe some coax as well, supported by the balloon.

This reminds me of a conversation I had with someone who supported public safety communications: "People who don't understand communication systems shouldn't make decisions regarding how they are implemented or maintained." The net result of the decisions we were discussing left some law enforcement officers nervous because their employer had neglected to appropriately fund the radio maintenance group which subsequently prioritized available resources as effectively as they could resulting in officers carrying around portable radios with dead batteries. Fortunately, most of these officers were never far from the car radio. The irony of the decision was that it was made by a career law enforcement officer who didn't know much about radio.

I'm sure there's a parallel there to any number of professions there.. (IT, education, etc...)

Just like the DoD jumps on hams on the coasts for the interference to PAVE/PAWS radar... but why is it now a problem? I can not seem to find out why?

see link http://www.eham.net/articles/16786

This issue is largely a non-issue. The military has been a silent giant for a number of years, and despite initial attempts to claim all of the radio spectrum for itself, it has politely kept commercial interests out of the VHF/UHF bands by virtue of being a secondary user on those bands, with the notable exception of locations where it is the primary user of the bands. Just so happens that PAVE/PAWS is located in one of those bands and as such, bound by the conditions of licensure, amateurs must surrender to the interests of the military. Inconvient? Probably. Illegal? Not at all, the sign was on the door when you walked in. Granted, PAVE/PAWS is a cold war-esque RADAR system, but it is still arguably a component of that silent war machine that keeps us safe from nuclear attacks.


There is a redundant post from ubernoir not displayed in this view.
 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics