| |
Just when you thought the posturing about Cho couldn't get any more stupid..
by Rattle at 4:37 pm EDT, Apr 20, 2007 |
Ladies and gentlemen, may I present to you a new low in journalism... Quoted below is the unedited above-the-jump text from a FoxNews story about the VT Tech shootings entitled: "Did the Devil Make Him Do it?" When unexplained violence takes center stage, we tend to turn to modern psychology to explain it. But there is an alternative explanation, one that has been played out in film, stage and writings since the beginning of history. Was Cho Seung-Hui schizophrenic … psychotic … manic-depressive? Or were the shooting deaths of 32 people, including Cho himself, at Virginia Tech University part of the ongoing struggle between God and Satan … good against evil … lightness and darkness? Could Cho have been possessed by the Devil? Could that explain the massacre at Virginia Tech? Dr. Richard Roberts, president of Oral Roberts University, shouts an unequivocal “Yes!” “Based on what I’ve seen in the news," Roberts said in an interview, "there’s no doubt that this act was Satanic in origin."
|
| |
RE: Just when you thought the posturing about Cho couldn't get any more stupid..
by possibly noteworthy at 5:39 pm EDT, Apr 20, 2007 |
Could Cho have been possessed by the Devil? Could that explain the massacre at Virginia Tech?
And now for the obligatory Church Lady reference: "What causes this mass hysteria?" Signed, Elaine. Well, Elaine, let's examine the word "Santa", shall we? [ holds up board with "SANTA" spelled across it in removeable letters ] Santa. Let's see, what have we got here? We've got an S and an A, an N, a T, and another A. Hmm ... [ rearranges the letters ] Who could be causing all those laps to bounce up and down curiously? Who would help grown men peel the focus from the baby Jesus on his birthday? Who could it be, I just don't know. Could it be ... Satan!?!
|
|
Just when you thought the posturing about Cho couldn't get any more stupid..
by k at 6:44 pm EDT, Apr 20, 2007 |
Ladies and gentlemen, may I present to you a new low in journalism... Quoted below is the unedited above-the-jump text from a FoxNews story about the VT Tech shootings entitled: "Did the Devil Make Him Do it?" When unexplained violence takes center stage, we tend to turn to modern psychology to explain it. But there is an alternative explanation, one that has been played out in film, stage and writings since the beginning of history. Was Cho Seung-Hui schizophrenic … psychotic … manic-depressive? Or were the shooting deaths of 32 people, including Cho himself, at Virginia Tech University part of the ongoing struggle between God and Satan … good against evil … lightness and darkness? Could Cho have been possessed by the Devil? Could that explain the massacre at Virginia Tech? Dr. Richard Roberts, president of Oral Roberts University, shouts an unequivocal “Yes!” “Based on what I’ve seen in the news," Roberts said in an interview, "there’s no doubt that this act was Satanic in origin."
*sigh* |
Just when you thought the posturing about Cho couldn't get any more stupid..
by Mike the Usurper at 7:20 pm EDT, Apr 20, 2007 |
Ladies and gentlemen, may I present to you a new low in journalism... Quoted below is the unedited above-the-jump text from a FoxNews story about the VT Tech shootings entitled: "Did the Devil Make Him Do it?" When unexplained violence takes center stage, we tend to turn to modern psychology to explain it. But there is an alternative explanation, one that has been played out in film, stage and writings since the beginning of history. Was Cho Seung-Hui schizophrenic … psychotic … manic-depressive? Or were the shooting deaths of 32 people, including Cho himself, at Virginia Tech University part of the ongoing struggle between God and Satan … good against evil … lightness and darkness? Could Cho have been possessed by the Devil? Could that explain the massacre at Virginia Tech? Dr. Richard Roberts, president of Oral Roberts University, shouts an unequivocal “Yes!” “Based on what I’ve seen in the news," Roberts said in an interview, "there’s no doubt that this act was Satanic in origin."
This surprises *anyone?* We're talking about Fox. |
|
|
