Decius wrote:
There is no sense to be made of this.

people go crazy + guns = this

i'm not suggesting recinding the 2nd amendment -- i think that would be a great but it's never gonna happen and even in the unlikely event of it being done too many Americans will never disarm

as Decius said "There is no sense to be made of this." it's a car wreck or a train wreck
random horror
u can't control it -- rationalise it -- or completely prevent it
sometimes life throws curve balls
so just pray u don't find yourself in the path of the tornado

hold your loved ones closer for a few days -- get up in the morning and carry on

I'm not really sure what to make of this blog, so I'll let you decide for yourself.

http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog&FriendID=171473490

Note the time it was posted. There were 79 comments at the time I posted this.

fatbox wrote:
I'm not really sure what to make of this blog, so I'll let you decide for yourself.

http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog&FriendID=171473490

Note the time it was posted. There were 79 comments at the time I posted this.

The post is gone, now.

possibly noteworthy wrote:

fatbox wrote:
I'm not really sure what to make of this blog, so I'll let you decide for yourself.

http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog&FriendID=171473490

Note the time it was posted. There were 79 comments at the time I posted this.

The post is gone, now.

No its not! MySpace is, er, error prone. Lots of traffic there.

fatbox wrote:
I'm not really sure what to make of this blog, so I'll let you decide for yourself.

http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog&FriendID=171473490

Note the time it was posted. There were 79 comments at the time I posted this.

There is a good chance its bullshit. You can set whatever time you want for a myspace blog, and there is nothing about this blog that establishes it as something old. With no friends and three blog posts, how did 79 people managed to find this? I figure the creator sent it out.

Decius wrote:

fatbox wrote:
I'm not really sure what to make of this blog, so I'll let you decide for yourself.

http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog&FriendID=171473490

Note the time it was posted. There were 79 comments at the time I posted this.

There is a good chance its bullshit. You can set whatever time you want for a myspace blog, and there is nothing about this blog that establishes it as something old. With no friends and three blog posts, how did 79 people managed to find this? I figure the creator sent it out.

Thanks, I wasn't aware of the ability to edit the timestamp. Makes sense though. Aside from that, there really was nothing to establish that it was real.

adam wrote:

people go crazy + guns = this

i'm not suggesting recinding the 2nd amendment -- i think that would be a great but it's never gonna happen and even in the unlikely event of it being done too many Americans will never disarm

Well, if we disarm all of the populous, then we'll be just like Britain.

The police don't have weapons, and the criminals do.

The reason I'm never going to disarm, is that it's my right to bear arms, just as it's my right to free speech.

I don't think that the issue here is one of Guns, it is one of a twisted individual, making it his last stand, and taking too many people with him.

Would you say that we should stop using fertilizer and diesel fuel if he had done the same with a bomb?

I realize that this is a tragedy, and my thoughts and prayers go out to those who have lost loved ones. But a knee jerk reaction to remove my right to bear arms is not the answer.

dc0de wrote:

adam wrote:

people go crazy + guns = this

i'm not suggesting recinding the 2nd amendment -- i think that would be a great but it's never gonna happen and even in the unlikely event of it being done too many Americans will never disarm

Well, if we disarm all of the populous, then we'll be just like Britain.

The police don't have weapons, and the criminals do.

The reason I'm never going to disarm, is that it's my right to bear arms, just as it's my right to free speech.

I don't think that the issue here is one of Guns, it is one of a twisted individual, making it his last stand, and taking too many people with him.

Would you say that we should stop using fertilizer and diesel fuel if he had done the same with a bomb?

I realize that this is a tragedy, and my thoughts and prayers go out to those who have lost loved ones. But a knee jerk reaction to remove my right to bear arms is not the answer.

you're missing the minor point I was making

if we disarm all of the populous, then we'll be just like Britain.

things like this virtually don't happen here because people aren't allowed guns
Dunblane happened and we had a law banning hand guns
when people go crazy here they do it with knives or swords
which obviously lessens the body count

the main point I was making however is that disarming America just isn't a viable option whatever the law says because as of now there are just too many guns in circulation and too many people who will never surrender their guns -- it would be more like Prohibition if such legislation was passed

passing legislation restricting guns in the UK is a lot easier because we start from a very different position than u in America

but your point about freedom is spurious
no freedom is absolute
free speech isn't absolute
your right to bear arms isn't absolute

what about nuclear weapons
your government has nuclear weapons
the founding fathers argument was that the population should be armed so it can overthrow the government
but that argument is politely and reasonably ignored now with reference to nuclear weapons

there's a SF novel by Charles Stross called Iron Sunrise in which they have replicator/nano technology and in one of the opening scenes one of the central characters has to go in and negiotiate with a nutter who has a home grown nuclear weapon

re fertilizer apart from Oklahoma u don't have a history of fertilizer bombs
Britain does via the IRA so here if someone buys chemicals in sufficient quantities that could be used to build bombs then flags will go up

when u have more experience of domestic terrorism u might do the same

adam wrote:

dc0de wrote:

adam wrote:

people go crazy + guns = this

i'm not suggesting recinding the 2nd amendment -- i think that would be a great but it's never gonna happen and even in the unlikely event of it being done too many Americans will never disarm

Well, if we disarm all of the populous, then we'll be just like Britain.

The police don't have weapons, and the criminals do.

The reason I'm never going to disarm, is that it's my right to bear arms, just as it's my right to free speech.

I realize that this is a tragedy, and my thoughts and prayers go out to those who have lost loved ones. But a knee jerk reaction to remove my right to bear arms is not the answer.

you're missing the minor point I was making

if we disarm all of the populous, then we'll be just like Britain.

things like this virtually don't happen here because people aren't allowed guns
Dunblane happened and we had a law banning hand guns
when people go crazy here they do it with knives or swords
which obviously lessens the body count

the main point I was making however is that disarming America just isn't a viable option whatever the law says because as of now there are just too many guns in circulation and too many people who will never surrender their guns -- it would be more like Prohibition if such legislation was passed

passing legislation restricting guns in the UK is a lot easier because we start from a very different position than u in America

but your point about freedom is spurious
no freedom is absolute
free speech isn't absolute
your right to bear arms isn't absolute

what about nuclear weapons
your government has nuclear weapons
the founding fathers argument was that the population should be armed so it can overthrow the government
but that argument is politely and reasonably ignored now with reference to nuclear weapons

there's a SF novel by Charles Stross called Iron Sunrise in which they have replicator/nano technology and in one of the opening scenes one of the central characters has to go in and negiotiate with a nutter who has a home grown nuclear weapon

re fertilizer apart from Oklahoma u don't have a history of fertilizer bombs
Britain does via the IRA so here if someone buys chemicals in sufficient quantities that could be used to build bombs then flags will go up

when u have more experience of domestic terrorism u might do the same

Regardless of Nuclear terror, I do have a bit of experience in domestic terrorism, having lived in Germany, during the Red Army Faction's push to kill US Soldiers, where the base I was working at was unsuccessfully rigged with explosives.

Also, I have quite a bit of experience with fertilizer weapons, having actually lived in Belfast in the Early 90's, and had the wonderful experience of being blown down the street by the 1500lb bomb that was set next to the Europa Hotel when the BA and RUC thought it was a 500lb'er... the cordon area was too small, and many of us were hurt...

I know terrorism all too well, and this is NOT terrorism, it's one nut job, going off the deep end...

If he didn't have projectile based weapons, he'd have thought of another way...

dc0de wrote:

adam wrote:

dc0de wrote:

adam wrote:

people go crazy + guns = this

i'm not suggesting recinding the 2nd amendment -- i think that would be a great but it's never gonna happen and even in the unlikely event of it being done too many Americans will never disarm

Well, if we disarm all of the populous, then we'll be just like Britain.

The police don't have weapons, and the criminals do.

The reason I'm never going to disarm, is that it's my right to bear arms, just as it's my right to free speech.

I realize that this is a tragedy, and my thoughts and prayers go out to those who have lost loved ones. But a knee jerk reaction to remove my right to bear arms is not the answer.

you're missing the minor point I was making

if we disarm all of the populous, then we'll be just like Britain.

things like this virtually don't happen here because people aren't allowed guns
Dunblane happened and we had a law banning hand guns
when people go crazy here they do it with knives or swords
which obviously lessens the body count

the main point I was making however is that disarming America just isn't a viable option whatever the law says because as of now there are just too many guns in circulation and too many people who will never surrender their guns -- it would be more like Prohibition if such legislation was passed

passing legislation restricting guns in the UK is a lot easier because we start from a very different position than u in America

but your point about freedom is spurious
no freedom is absolute
free speech isn't absolute
your right to bear arms isn't absolute

what about nuclear weapons
your government has nuclear weapons
the founding fathers argument was that the population should be armed so it can overthrow the government
but that argument is politely and reasonably ignored now with reference to nuclear weapons

there's a SF novel by Charles Stross called Iron Sunrise in which they have replicator/nano technology and in one of the opening scenes one of the central characters has to go in and negiotiate with a nutter who has a home grown nuclear weapon

re fertilizer apart from Oklahoma u don't have a history of fertilizer bombs
Britain does via the IRA so here if someone buys chemicals in sufficient quantities that could be used to build bombs then flags will go up

when u have more experience of domestic terrorism u might do the same

Regardless of Nuclear terror, I do have a bit of experience in domestic terrorism, having lived in Germany, during the Red Army Faction's push to kill US Soldiers, where the base I was working at was unsuccessfully rigged with explosives.

Also, I have quite a bit of experience with fertilizer weapons, having actually lived in Belfast in the Early 90's, and had the wonderful experience of being blown down the street by the 1500lb bomb that was set next to the Europa Hotel when the BA and RUC thought it was a 500lb'er... the cordon area was too small, and many of us were hurt...

I know terrorism all too well, and this is NOT terrorism, it's one nut job, going off the deep end...

If he didn't have projectile based weapons, he'd have thought of another way...

i didn't mean u personally
i meant u america