|
Don't Let Congress Shackle Digital Music by Hijexx at 3:14 pm EST, Feb 7, 2007 |
Via jwz: * * * The new Congress has barely begun, but the major record labels are already up to their old tricks. Sen. Dianne Feinstein has re-introduced the PERFORM Act, a backdoor assault on your right to record off the radio. Satellite and digital radio stations as well as Internet webcasters would have to adopt digital rights management (DRM) restrictions or lose the statutory license for broadcasting music. Letters from constituents like you helped beat this dangerous proposal last year -- take action now to block it again. This bill aims to hobble TiVo-like devices for satellite and digital radio. Such devices would be allowed to include "reasonable recording" features, but that excludes choosing and playing back selections based on song title, artist, or genre. Want to freely move recordings around your home network or copy them to the portable player of your choice? You'll be out of luck if PERFORM passes. This bill would also mess with Internet radio. Today, Live365, Shoutcast, streaming radio stations included in iTunes, and myriad other smaller webcasters rely on MP3 streaming. PERFORM would in effect force them to use DRM-laden, proprietary formats, so you can say goodbye to software tools like Streamripper that let you record programming to listen to it later. Tell your representatives to oppose the PERFORM Act now. |
|
RE: Don't Let Congress Shackle Digital Music by skullaria at 7:05 pm EST, Feb 8, 2007 |
From Senator Chambliss - Dear Ms. Gilleland : Thank you for contacting me regarding S. 256, the "Platform Equality and Remedies for Rights Holders in Music (PERFORM) Act of 2007." I appreciate hearing from you. While I certainly understand your position and share your interest in technological innovation and the future of the Internet, I believe we in Congress have the duty t o promote an environment that respects and protects intellectual property rights. As you may be aware, cable, satellite, and Internet radio services are granted a license to broadcast music as long as they pay a legislatively determined fee and abide by the terms and conditions of the government license. However, some of the terms of these licenses are different. This bill is designed to create parity among the technologies so they may compete on the same playing field to provide consumers their choice of music, anytime, in any place, in any format. Certain features of new devices and technologies bypass the marketplace by allowing consumers to turn broadcasts into downloads, and creating an unlicensed music library without adequately paying the artist. You can be sure that I will keep your views in mind should this bill come before the Senate.
Yeah? I'm so sure he will. Really sounds like it. Uh-huh. Why can't I play the music I paid for in I-tunes on my Sansa you old fart? WHY? No more I-tunes for me, and no more old farts either! |
|
Don't Let Congress Shackle Digital Music by Decius at 3:30 pm EST, Feb 7, 2007 |
Via jwz: * * * The new Congress has barely begun, but the major record labels are already up to their old tricks. Sen. Dianne Feinstein has re-introduced the PERFORM Act, a backdoor assault on your right to record off the radio. Satellite and digital radio stations as well as Internet webcasters would have to adopt digital rights management (DRM) restrictions or lose the statutory license for broadcasting music.
Well, Congress is off to quite a start this year. In addition to killing off small webcasters they're talking writing a blank check for the DOJ to create ISP Data Retention requirements and they're back in to fining sites like MemeStreams hundreds of thousands of dollars if we fail to comply with an arcane reporting rule for child porn incidents. They are also seeking to criminalize Internet use: Another section of the draft bill says that anyone convicted of certain child exploitation-related offenses who also used the "Internet to commit the violation" will get an extra 10 years in prison. Marv Johnson, a legislative counsel with the American Civil Liberties Union, said the extra 10 years in prison was an odd requirement because the Internet is not inherently dangerous like a firearm. Rather, he said, the bill proposes to punish someone for using a perfectly legal item or service in an illegal way. "It would be like punishing someone additionally for driving a car in the commission of an offense," Johnson said.
Moral panic is so awesome! |
There is a redundant post from Palindrome not displayed in this view.
|
|