|
Rumsfeld’s Memo of Options for Iraq War by noteworthy at 8:33 am EST, Dec 3, 2006 |
This puts a new spin on Rumsfeld's exit. The situation in Iraq has been evolving, and U.S. forces have adjusted, over time, from major combat operations to counterterrorism, to counterinsurgency, to dealing with death squads and sectarian violence. In my view it is time for a major adjustment. Clearly, what US forces are currently doing in Iraq is not working well enough or fast enough.
You have to think about who is leaking the memo and what their objectives might be, though it certainly gives the appearance that he was dropped for disloyalty ... and perhaps a perceived unwillingness to "stay the course." Not that this memo was actually a trigger for Bush; he was already interviewing Gates and had possibly made his decision. But it makes clear that a critical eye on Iraq was quite unwelcome. The ideas collected here are not especially original; one gets the impression that the memo was drafted after a Pentagon skull session, based on an hour or so of brainstorming and a Lexis-Nexis search. You'll even find some variations on Gary Brecher's ideas in the list: Provide money to key political and religious leaders (as Saddam Hussein did), to get them to help us get through this difficult period.
|
|
RE: Rumsfeld’s Memo of Options for Iraq War by ubernoir at 9:13 am EST, Dec 3, 2006 |
start “taking our hand off the bicycle seat”
seems typically Rumsfeld to characterize an entire nation as a child and with the “If you want more of something, reward it; if you want less of something, penalize it.” the extraordinary arrogance of the man junior highschool child psychology as foreign policy and counter-insurgancy strategy or is it because Rumsfeld thinks Bush is an idiot, lets characterize the plan in morsels the President can consume or more likely revealing of both |
|
Rumsfeld’s Memo of Options for Iraq War by Decius at 11:35 am EST, Dec 3, 2006 |
The situation in Iraq has been evolving, and U.S. forces have adjusted, over time, from major combat operations to counterterrorism, to counterinsurgency, to dealing with death squads and sectarian violence. In my view it is time for a major adjustment. Clearly, what US forces are currently doing in Iraq is not working well enough or fast enough.
This memo is, frankly, strange. A wide assortment of contradictory options are sort of spread about without any apparent preference or analysis. Do we really make strategic decisions this way? Or was this memo created for public disclosure. Bush could very well pin this to a dart board. |
|
|