k wrote:

The 2008 Presidential campaign began yesterday. Whatever the Democrats do with their new-found congressional power over the next two years, it will be with the big 2008 prize in mind.

Some Democrats want to expose the malfeasance and nonfeasance of the Bush Administration -- find out who really knew what and when with regard to weapons of mass destruction, Abu Graahb, Katrina, payoffs to Abramoff, and all the other rot. That’s understandable, but it would be far better if Democrats used their new-found power to lay out a new agenda for America.

There’s no point digging up more dirt. Bush isn’t running again. John McCain, the Republican’s most likely choice to replace him, has distanced himself so far from the administration that no amount of dirt will soil him. Besides, the public and the media are already suffering from outrage fatigue. And the Democrats wouldn’t be credible, anyway. It will be easy for Republicans to dismiss their efforts as more of the same old partisan bickering. The fact is, the public is sick of mud-slinging.

Instead of dwelling on what’s gone wrong, Democrats should focus on what to do right.

Which is pretty much what I've been saying, I think. Payback would feel good, but I think ultimately focusing on a Bush takedown attempt would hurt absolutely everyone.

It's true. The best revenge would be to live sweetly. I would hope that's the tact they would take and Business Week has an article that shows a pretty convincing agenda that will be difficult to get through in 2 years. My only caveat to this is with $500B spent on the WoT, you've absolutely GOT to have an independent audit on where that money went and why. That money could've funded education reform, universal health care, or 10 years of energy R&D. All things we desperately need.

k wrote:

The 2008 Presidential campaign began yesterday. Whatever the Democrats do with their new-found congressional power over the next two years, it will be with the big 2008 prize in mind.

Some Democrats want to expose the malfeasance and nonfeasance of the Bush Administration -- find out who really knew what and when with regard to weapons of mass destruction, Abu Graahb, Katrina, payoffs to Abramoff, and all the other rot. That’s understandable, but it would be far better if Democrats used their new-found power to lay out a new agenda for America.

There’s no point digging up more dirt. Bush isn’t running again. John McCain, the Republican’s most likely choice to replace him, has distanced himself so far from the administration that no amount of dirt will soil him. Besides, the public and the media are already suffering from outrage fatigue. And the Democrats wouldn’t be credible, anyway. It will be easy for Republicans to dismiss their efforts as more of the same old partisan bickering. The fact is, the public is sick of mud-slinging.

Instead of dwelling on what’s gone wrong, Democrats should focus on what to do right.

Which is pretty much what I've been saying, I think. Payback would feel good, but I think ultimately focusing on a Bush takedown attempt would hurt absolutely everyone.

Much as I'd like to see W impeached, the concept of President Cheney is even more offensive. A better plan is to lame duck him into the ground and then when he's no longer in office, prosecute him.