|
This page contains all of the posts and discussion on MemeStreams referencing the following web page: The Quietest War. You can find discussions on MemeStreams as you surf the web, even if you aren't a MemeStreams member, using the Threads Bookmarklet.
|
The Quietest War by possibly noteworthy at 9:49 pm EDT, Oct 16, 2006 |
Yet all these conflicts [of the 20th century], terrible as they often were, may be considered the growth spasms of a vigorous democracy. Even the fissures that Vietnam opened in our society, with all the bad feelings they emanated for years to come, can be seen as an enduring lesson in liberty: When the government ran an undeclared war the people did not support, they put an end to it. In that war at home there was honor on both sides; early on in our escalation in Indochina, there were even mass rallies held in favor of the war. Wrongheaded as those might now seem to have been, I prefer them to our current state of civic disengagement. The most disappointing realization about the war in Iraq is how little we care, how precious few demonstrators there are on either side of the issue. Just as the war exists for most of us on television, so we have subcontracted out our civic feeling to the angry rhetoric of so many ranting heads. We do not serve, we do not pay, we do not watch, and we do not object. Imagine how this might have worked in World War II. No matter how this war comes out, we have already lost.
|
|
RE: The Quietest War by Decius at 12:40 am EDT, Oct 17, 2006 |
possibly noteworthy wrote: The most disappointing realization about the war in Iraq is how little we care, how precious few demonstrators there are on either side of the issue.
I don't follow. There were extremely large demonstrations all over the country when the war started, and the war is the core reason for the relatively high degree of partisan political strife. No one is protesting NOW because there is nothing to protest. Whether or not getting involved in the war was a good idea, we're involved. The question is whether we can get uninvolved without causing more problems then we've solved. Both parties want the same thing here, and no one seems to have firm ideas about how to do it. A lot of the stuff he is referencing were race riots, draft protests, and labor disputes. None of that has anything to do with this, and I don't quite get why thats a bad thing... |
|
|
|