|
Puppy smoothies: Improving the reliability of open, collaborative wikis by Rattle at 1:40 pm EDT, Sep 11, 2006 |
The reliability of information collected from at large Internet users by open collaborative wikis such as Wikipedia has been a subject of widespread debate. This paper provides a practical proposal for improving user confidence in wiki information by coloring the text of a wiki article based on the venerability of the text. This proposal relies on the philosophy that bad information is less likely to survive a collaborative editing process over large numbers of edits. Colorization would provide users with a clear visual cue as to the level of confidence that they can place in particular assertions made within a wiki article.
Congratulations to Tom, who has been published in this month's issue of First Monday. The material his article covers was first presented at last year's PhreakNIC Conference. Video of the talk (Google Video) is available. The point where Tom talks about his reliability system for Wikipedia is about 30 minutes into the presentation. Update: Instalanche. Update2: Slashdotted. |
Puppy smoothies: Improving the reliability of open, collaborative wikis by Decius at 1:52 pm EDT, Sep 11, 2006 |
The reliability of information collected from at large Internet users by open collaborative wikis such as Wikipedia has been a subject of widespread debate. This paper provides a practical proposal for improving user confidence in wiki information by coloring the text of a wiki article based on the venerability of the text. This proposal relies on the philosophy that bad information is less likely to survive a collaborative editing process over large numbers of edits. Colorization would provide users with a clear visual cue as to the level of confidence that they can place in particular assertions made within a wiki article.
I got published in this month's issue of First Monday! Make sure you check out the issue because there are a number of good articles in it. The material my article covers was first presented at last year's PhreakNIC Conference during a talk that Rattle and I gave on various things we're working on. Video of the talk (Google Video) is available. The point where I talk about my reliability system for Wikipedia is about 30 minutes into the presentation. |
Puppy smoothies: Improving the reliability of open, collaborative wikis by noteworthy at 7:39 pm EDT, Sep 11, 2006 |
The reliability of information collected from at large Internet users by open collaborative wikis such as Wikipedia has been a subject of widespread debate. This paper provides a practical proposal for improving user confidence in wiki information by coloring the text of a wiki article based on the venerability of the text. This proposal relies on the philosophy that bad information is less likely to survive a collaborative editing process over large numbers of edits. Colorization would provide users with a clear visual cue as to the level of confidence that they can place in particular assertions made within a wiki article.
Congratulations to Tom, who has been published in this month's issue of First Monday. The material his article covers was first presented at last year's PhreakNIC Conference. Video of the talk (Google Video) is available. The point where Tom talks about his reliability system for Wikipedia is about 30 minutes into the presentation. |
Puppy smoothies: Improving the reliability of open, collaborative wikis by k at 12:23 am EDT, Sep 16, 2006 |
The reliability of information collected from at large Internet users by open collaborative wikis such as Wikipedia has been a subject of widespread debate. This paper provides a practical proposal for improving user confidence in wiki information by coloring the text of a wiki article based on the venerability of the text. This proposal relies on the philosophy that bad information is less likely to survive a collaborative editing process over large numbers of edits. Colorization would provide users with a clear visual cue as to the level of confidence that they can place in particular assertions made within a wiki article.
I got published in this month's issue of First Monday! Make sure you check out the issue because there are a number of good articles in it. [ Good stuff, as usual, Tom! Congrats! -k] |
|
|