| |
MemeStreams | Social Network - Most Recommended Users
by Lost at 3:28 pm EDT, Jun 25, 2006 |
Woe is me, I wish I were top 20. |
| |
RE: MemeStreams | Social Network - Most Recommended Users
by ubernoir at 5:34 pm EDT, Jun 25, 2006 |
Jello wrote:
Woe is me, I wish I were top 20.
ditto 8-(
jello at least you're no 26 i'm no 48! |
|
| |
RE: MemeStreams | Social Network - Most Recommended Users
by janelane at 12:17 pm EDT, Jun 26, 2006 |
Jello wrote:
Woe is me, I wish I were top 20.
Woe be unto all of us if Decius fell out of the top spot. :-) -janelane |
|
| | |
RE: MemeStreams | Social Network - Most Recommended Users
by Lost at 1:31 pm EDT, Jun 26, 2006 |
janelane wrote: Jello wrote:
Woe is me, I wish I were top 20.
Woe be unto all of us if Decius fell out of the top spot. :-) -janelane
I propose that the top three positions be static, for Decius, Jeremy and Rattle :) |
|
| |
RE: MemeStreams | Social Network - Most Recommended Users
by Decius at 2:26 pm EDT, Jun 26, 2006 |
Jello wrote:
Woe is me, I wish I were top 20.
Rattle double checked the database. While you are a far more prolific poster then many on the top 20 list, and you have a far wider array of readers (more people click on your links), fewer of your links have been rerecommended, and that is the measure we use for that list. Sorry man, you're not far.... :) |
|
| | |
RE: MemeStreams | Social Network - Most Recommended Users
by flynn23 at 7:08 pm EDT, Jun 26, 2006 |
Decius wrote: Jello wrote:
Woe is me, I wish I were top 20.
Rattle double checked the database. While you are a far more prolific poster then many on the top 20 list, and you have a far wider array of readers (more people click on your links), fewer of your links have been rerecommended, and that is the measure we use for that list. Sorry man, you're not far.... :)
How dynamic is this list generated? Cuz I hate to say it, but one of the top 10 posters has been dead since 2004. Although I can imagine that his posts got rerecommended like a mutha, it would seem that this list is not temporal, and is based upon high water marks set for all time. True? |
|
| | | |
RE: MemeStreams | Social Network - Most Recommended Users
by Decius at 8:01 pm EDT, Jun 26, 2006 |
flynn23 wrote:
How dynamic is this list generated? Cuz I hate to say it, but one of the top 10 posters has been dead since 2004. Although I can imagine that his posts got rerecommended like a mutha, it would seem that this list is not temporal, and is based upon high water marks set for all time. True?
Yes, thats correct, and we agree thats a problem. The whole system needs to look at a sliding window. |
|
| | |
RE: MemeStreams | Social Network - Most Recommended Users
by Lost at 7:39 am EDT, Jun 27, 2006 |
Decius wrote: Jello wrote:
Woe is me, I wish I were top 20.
Rattle double checked the database. While you are a far more prolific poster then many on the top 20 list, and you have a far wider array of readers (more people click on your links), fewer of your links have been rerecommended, and that is the measure we use for that list. Sorry man, you're not far.... :)
Scoundrel! This is the thanks I get!? :) |
|
|
|
