Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

MemeStreams Discussion

search


This page contains all of the posts and discussion on MemeStreams referencing the following web page: Congress readies DMCA ][. You can find discussions on MemeStreams as you surf the web, even if you aren't a MemeStreams member, using the Threads Bookmarklet.

Congress readies DMCA ][
by Decius at 7:30 am EDT, Apr 24, 2006

New technology is "encouraging large-scale criminal enterprises to get involved in intellectual-property theft," Gonzales said, adding that proceeds from the illicit businesses are used, "quite frankly, to fund terrorism activities."

Willful attempts at piracy, even if they fail, could be punished by up to 10 years in prison.

But one of the more controversial sections may be the changes to the DMCA. Under current law, Section 1201 of the law generally prohibits distributing or trafficking in any software or hardware that can be used to bypass copy-protection devices. (That section already has been used against a Princeton computer science professor, Russian programmer Dmitry Sklyarov and a toner cartridge remanufacturer.)

Smith's measure would expand those civil and criminal restrictions. Instead of merely targeting distribution, the new language says nobody may "make, import, export, obtain control of, or possess" such anticircumvention tools if they may be redistributed to someone else.

When the Attorney General raises the specter of terrorism in the context of laws which primarily related to p2p file trading networks, its time to stop taking the Attorney General seriously. He is obviously not a serious person.

As for Lamar Smith, he is responsible for 2004's round of rock stupid DNS WHOIS legislation.


 
RE: Congress readies DMCA ][
by k at 2:31 pm EDT, Apr 24, 2006

New technology is "encouraging large-scale criminal enterprises to get involved in intellectual-property theft," Gonzales said, adding that proceeds from the illicit businesses are used, "quite frankly, to fund terrorism activities."

Absurd. At best, this is a confusion between piracy of physical objects and piracy of purely digital objects. Explain to me how there is money being made from the efforts of file sharers? Isn't the entire point that they're not paying?

Furthermore, I quite simply do not buy this argument. Organized crime, yes, fine, I'll swallow that.

Gonzales gets negative 1000 points for invoking terrorists in a venue which has absolutely nothing to do with the topic. If you download Chingy, kids, Osama gets stronger!

Pathetic.


 
RE: Congress readies DMCA ][
by bmitchell at 1:14 pm EDT, Apr 25, 2006

The freedom-to-tinker blog has an entry on this legislation.

US Copyright May Get Harsher and Broader.


There is a redundant post from Rattle not displayed in this view.
 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics