|
Who really gets hurt by 'prioritization' of the Internet by Acidus at 11:01 am EST, Jan 23, 2006 |
At the end of the day, Google's Davidson says that his biggest worry is not for Google but for the prospect of bringing fresh innovation to the Internet. After all, if worse comes to worst, Google can pay AT&T or BellSouth to maintain its role as the Internet's dominant search engine. But the bright young start-up with the next big innovative idea won't have that option.
This is exactly my concern. |
|
RE: Who really gets hurt by 'prioritization' of the Internet by ubernoir at 6:17 pm EST, Jan 24, 2006 |
Acidus wrote: At the end of the day, Google's Davidson says that his biggest worry is not for Google but for the prospect of bringing fresh innovation to the Internet. After all, if worse comes to worst, Google can pay AT&T or BellSouth to maintain its role as the Internet's dominant search engine. But the bright young start-up with the next big innovative idea won't have that option.
This is exactly my concern.
with reference to an article previously recommended on memestreams the service provided by AT&T is not providing pipes but rather providing a marketplace (a bazaar) in that context it is perceived on both sides of the atlantic that it is philisophically legitimate to maintain the market as a level playing field eg anti-trust (monopoly legislation) insider trading legislation innovation is the engine of capitalism and requires a level marketplace these threats are anti free market |
|
Who really gets hurt by 'prioritization' of the Internet by k at 5:54 pm EST, Jan 23, 2006 |
At the end of the day, Google's Davidson says that his biggest worry is not for Google but for the prospect of bringing fresh innovation to the Internet. After all, if worse comes to worst, Google can pay AT&T or BellSouth to maintain its role as the Internet's dominant search engine. But the bright young start-up with the next big innovative idea won't have that option.
This is exactly my concern. [ I second that. Or, uh, third, I guess. -k] |
Who really gets hurt by 'prioritization' of the Internet by noteworthy at 8:18 am EST, Jan 25, 2006 |
Would these new fees imposed by carriers alter the basic nature of the Internet by putting bumps and detours on the much ballyhooed information superhighway? No, say the telephone companies. Giving priority to a company that pays more, they say, is just offering another tier of service -- like an airline offering business as well as economy class. Network neutrality, they say, is a solution in search of a problem.
Any business practice that even vaguely resembles the airline industry should be met with a hefty dose of skepticism. Obviously, these telco spokespeople have some homework to do. Let me help: Changes In Demand For Air Travel Overall, passengers have become more empowered due to transparency in price and service information, and it appears that passengers are becoming more value conscious, demanding choice, and flexibility. However they are prepared to give up frills, choice or flexibility in return for lower prices. This is certainly very evident on short haul routes.
Making sense of the airline business The key to survival, then, is an economic limbo dance that allows the carriers to keep seats as full as possible while driving costs as low as they’ll go — while knowing too much pressure on either end brings the risk of losing customers and scuttling your business. At this point, travelers are discovering that real, qualitative differences in service are ever harder to find on the shorter-haul flights that make up most domestic air traffic. Even premium travelers have begun to flirt with low-cost options, and low-cost airlines have won at the expectations game, educating customers beforehand so they’re happy when they deplane.
This article by Hal Varian merits further study: Differential Pricing and Efficiency, by Hal Varian The classic prescription for economically efficient pricing---set price at marginal cost---is not relevant for technologies that exhibit the kinds of increasing returns to scale, large fixed costs, or economies of scope found in the telecommunications and information industries. The appropriate guiding principle in these contexts should be that the marginal willingness to pay should be equal to marginal cost. This condition for efficiency can be approximated using differential pricing, and will in fact, be a natural outcome of profit-seeking behavior.
Perhaps we should write to him and ask him to write about this topic in his next NYT column. I found this data interesting: Advertisers Climb On Board ... [ Read More (0.3k in body) ] |
Who really gets hurt by 'prioritization' of the Internet by Rattle at 9:04 am EST, Jan 25, 2006 |
Hear BellSouth's scream - "You sunk my battleship!" - as Noteworthy blows their airline analogy out of the water: Would these new fees imposed by carriers alter the basic nature of the Internet by putting bumps and detours on the much ballyhooed information superhighway? No, say the telephone companies. Giving priority to a company that pays more, they say, is just offering another tier of service -- like an airline offering business as well as economy class. Network neutrality, they say, is a solution in search of a problem.
Any business practice that even vaguely resembles the airline industry should be met with a hefty dose of skepticism. Obviously, these telco spokespeople have some homework to do. Let me help: Changes In Demand For Air Travel Overall, passengers have become more empowered due to transparency in price and service information, and it appears that passengers are becoming more value conscious, demanding choice, and flexibility. However they are prepared to give up frills, choice or flexibility in return for lower prices. This is certainly very evident on short haul routes.
Making sense of the airline business The key to survival, then, is an economic limbo dance that allows the carriers to keep seats as full as possible while driving costs as low as they’ll go — while knowing too much pressure on either end brings the risk of losing customers and scuttling your business. At this point, travelers are discovering that real, qualitative differences in service are ever harder to find on the shorter-haul flights that make up most domestic air traffic. Even premium travelers have begun to flirt with low-cost options, and low-cost airlines have won at the expectations game, educating customers beforehand so they’re happy when they deplane.
This article by Hal Varian merits further study: Differential Pricing and Efficiency, by Hal Varian The classic prescription for economically efficient pricing---set price at marginal cost---is not relevant for technologies that exhibit the kinds of increasing returns to scale, large fixed costs, or economies of scope found in the telecommunications and information industries. The appropriate guiding principle in these contexts should be that the marginal willingness to pay should be equal to marginal cost. This condition for efficiency can be approximated using differential pricing, and will in fact, be a natural outcome of profit-seeking behavior.
Perhaps we should write to him and ask him to writ... [ Read More (0.3k in body) ] |
There is a redundant post from nethope not displayed in this view.
|
|