Mike the Usurper wrote:

The position of NAS/NSTA is that what Kansas has done is flat opposed to what they have put out. Their statement and the NAS/NSTA are incompatible and because of that, they have declined to let Kansas include their publications.

But why is it copyrighted in the first place? Why not put it in the public domain? Is this the only reason it is copyrighted, or are there other reasons? Does Kansas pay for it?

RE: Intellectual Property Evolutionists Are Wrong!