dmv wrote:
If by wiki you mean writeable by anyone... it seems like the wikispam and wikiattacks would render the system unusable.

Just like they render wikipedia unusable.

Could you imagine that source being even remotely less biased than the League of Women Voters? I can't.

Unfortunately the LWV doesn't provide the depth of coverage in Georgia that a real voter information guide does. They often don't have all the races covered, they don't have responses from all of the politicians, or the responses they got were not adequate. I think what they do is very important in lieu of a better source, but it is not sufficient. Have you ever lived in California?

RE: A wiki voter information guide | SinceSlicedBread.com