Vile wrote:

By the way, being anti-abortion and pro-choice ARE inconsistent. It is a hypocritical way of saying that you want to get laid without consequences, yet you don't wanna shell out a couple of bucks to help the bitch pay for the abortion when the time comes. Shame on you.

Since pretty much everything you say is inane, I'll only respond to the specific part where you assess my position. Incorrectly.

I believe the following :

1. Abortion may or may not be "murder" in the strictest sense, but the very fact that it's questionable means I'd ultimately feel better if it wasn't ever done.

2. It's 100% not up to me. Unless i'm the father and then it's 99% not up to me. Someone else has to carry and birth that thing, so they get to make the call.

2b. If we lived in a society in which the "villiage" could raise the children, my attitude would be less stringent. Since, in fact, we live in a world which is unsypathetic to these kinds of situations, it becomes the choice of the mother.

3. I *do* want to get laid without consequenses. Who doesn't? I do not, of course, believe this is realistic in our world.

4. Pharmacists should not be empowered to make judgements on the fulfillment of a prescription signed by a doctor unless they demonstrate a verifiable medical concern.

RE: Rape victim: 'Morning after' pill denied | The Arizona Daily Star