|
Daily News Exclusive: Terror tip for rich by Mike the Usurper at 7:13 pm EDT, Oct 14, 2005 |
"We're briefing the mayor, ratcheting up security, talking about when to go public - and Homeland Security is downplaying the whole thing while their people are telling friends to stay out of the subways," a police source said. "It's pretty bad."
It seems that at the same time that Bloomberg is saying "we have a threat" and Homeland Security is saying "This isn't confirmed," internally, they're telling their friends things they don't tell the rest of the public. What the hell is going on here? Government "of the people, by the people, but for the few?" |
|
RE: Daily News Exclusive: Terror tip for rich by logickal at 5:29 pm EDT, Oct 15, 2005 |
Mike the Usurper wrote: It seems that at the same time that Bloomberg is saying "we have a threat" and Homeland Security is saying "This isn't confirmed," internally, they're telling their friends things they don't tell the rest of the public. What the hell is going on here? Government "of the people, by the people, but for the few?"
If this offends you, you should really check out this Neil Boortz ranting bit via mediamatters.org.... |
|
| |
RE: Daily News Exclusive: Terror tip for rich by Mike the Usurper at 2:55 am EDT, Oct 16, 2005 |
logickal wrote: Mike the Usurper wrote: It seems that at the same time that Bloomberg is saying "we have a threat" and Homeland Security is saying "This isn't confirmed," internally, they're telling their friends things they don't tell the rest of the public. What the hell is going on here? Government "of the people, by the people, but for the few?"
If this offends you, you should really check out this Neil Boortz ranting bit via mediamatters.org....
What appalls me about this isn't people telling friends/family about this. I sort of expect that. What I dislike about it is that they are saying one thing to those people and saying something completely different to everyone else. Advance notice is one thing, and given the group this appears to have gone to, fine. But saying two entirely different things is not in the same ballpark. |
|
|
|