MemeStreams | MemeStreams Discussion

Create an Account

This page contains all of the posts and discussion on MemeStreams referencing the following web page: Technorati top search terms are manipulated. You can find discussions on MemeStreams as you surf the web, even if you aren't a MemeStreams member, using the Threads Bookmarklet.

Technorati top search terms are manipulated
by Rattle at 3:16 am EDT, Oct 9, 2005

Technorati's current top search term is "Bush Defrocked". It appears they have become a victim, or perpetrator, of an effort to manipulate people into having a false view of what the public is interested in. There are no blog posts coming up for that search term, no news taking place which would make it a "hot topic", and other blog search engines are not showing results either.

I'm guessing their list of top search terms is based on the number of queries they receive for any given term, rather than the number of posts in their index for a given term. That would make it pretty easy for an external entity to manipulate.

At the time of this posting, these were the other terms:

2. "Web 2.0"
3. Earthquake
4. "Paul Krugman"
5. "David Brooks"
6. "John Tierney"
7. "Grand Challenge"
8. Flock
9. "Leo Laporte"
10. Serenity

Lately, "Impeach Bush" had been one of the top terms. I always though that was kind of strange. That term's absence in the presence of this one leads me to theorize that their entire top term index is being manipulated, and the party behind it just changed the term they push.

But then again, who knows.. Technorati is known to exercise editorial control over their index. Nothing would lead me to believe they do not exercise it elsewhere. A number of popular blogs are omitted from the Top 100 Blogs List, for as best as anyone can tell, "bloggy" political reasons. Slashdot and Scripting News are examples. I'm sure there are more.

I don't really trust Technocrat. Not to mention, they are exactly the type of company I worry about someone buying with a history of using media to manipulate people for political purposes. This "Bush Defrocked" thing is proof that there are people who want to do just that. I'd like to know who is behind it. I worry about situations where things will happen that people can't see coming. Significant manipulation of public perception over specific issues can be carried out with a high degree of subtlety.

This is a good example of some of the issues we have to be concerned about in regard to the design of social web tools. I'll be talking about this stuff at the "Information Warfare for The People" talk at PhreakNIC later this month. There is also a possibility that Industrial Memetics will be sponsoring the hotel's conference TV channel and providing content.

Update: "Bush Defrocked" has disappeared from Technorati's top search terms. Looks like they took notice ..

RE: Technorati top search terms are manipulated
by everythingbetween.com at 4:09 am EDT, Oct 9, 2005

I've been incredibly curious about the dominance of New York Times editorial contributors and their columns being listed in the Technorati Top 10. This has been the trend ever since reading editorials on NYtimes.com has become a premium service.

Another interesting aside: "Bush Defrocked" is printed on the nytimes homepage... but the article (and headline) itself does not include the phrase "Bush Defrocked."

Leery here... not tryingn to spark some controversy involving the Times... that would just be, ahem, unheard of!

Rattle wrote:
Technorati's current top search term is "Bush Defrocked".

New York Times subscription wall has created vaccum?
by Rattle at 6:38 am EDT, Oct 9, 2005

I've been incredibly curious about the dominance of New York Times editorial contributors and their columns being listed in the Technorati Top 10. This has been the trend ever since reading editorials on NYtimes.com has become a premium service.

That's and easy one to explain. Since the NYT has put up the subscription wall, people are looking for commentary on the columns that are no longer accessible to them. No one is willing to pay for access to a very small number of people, even if one of them is Thomas Friedman. Web 2.0 type people should take note this.

Another interesting aside: "Bush Defrocked" is printed on the nytimes homepage... but the article (and headline) itself does not include the phrase "Bush Defrocked."
Leery here... not tryingn to spark some controversy involving the Times... that would just be, ahem, unheard of!

That may explain something. There is a Frank Rich column that has "Defrocked" in its title and "Bush" in its body. That would imply there is a significant number of people searching for commentary on that column. It's about the Miers nomination, so that may be plausible. Almost...

It's still very strange that this search term came up at the same time as "Impeach Bush" went away. The top search term manipulation issue is still a concern. That type of thing is very dangerous, regardless of what ideology its used to push forward.

If anything, its a wake-up call for the New York Times. People clearly want access to content they have, but are unwilling to pay for it. Let's hope they do not hit the snooze button. The loser is the marketplace of ideas. We can't have that.