Mike the Usurper wrote:

The White House initially would not give details of the 10 plots that Bush mentioned in his morning speech before the National Endowment for Democracy, saying some information remained classified. But in the evening, the White House released a fact sheet with a brief, and vague, description of each.

No. This is not credible in any way shape or form.

What is your point of view?
A. There really aren't any terrorists and its all a big conspiracy. There is no war on terror and thousands of people in the federal government including the whole law enforcement establishment are in on it.
B. There are terrorists, but every time they try to attack they are successful. The U.S. Government has not foiled any attacks because the FBI and Intelligence agencies are totally incompetent and the terrorists are flawless.
C. The U.S. Government has actually foiled some attacks, but not these specific 10. They foiled some other, different list of a handful of attacks worldwide.

If your answer is C, please explain to me why they would list this handful of attacks instead of the actual handful of attacks they really foiled, and what difference that makes.

RE: Bush: U.S. Foiled at Least 10 Terror Plots