Decius wrote:

k wrote:
[ But he's doing it *for* the children. Right? To keep it from them? Or is it Jesus? ]

It was Jesus.

Was Jesus anti-pr0n? Before or after the thing with the prostitute?

Excuse my apparent ignorance but WHAT thing with the prostitute?

I say he's guilty of misuse of public money already and should be prosceuted himself.

Jesus is guily of misuse of public money? The dude has been dead for a while. I'm not too concerned about Roman tax fraud, anyway...

I like Dan Brown's take on this. Jesus was married (like any good Rabbi would be) and the church turned Mary Magdeline into a hooker to put women in their place.

Frankly, stop going after porn, decriminalize drugs, free up some space in the jails, and put the violent (Eric Rudolph, Jeffy Dahmer, Ted Bundy) and mass property crime guys (Ken Lay, Bernie "What do you mean 25 years?" Ebbers, Dennis Kozlowski) in jail for long periods based on their damage to society.

Stop trying to screw with my pr0n supply!

Remember, guns don't kill people, bullets do.

RE: law.com - U.S. Attorney's Porn Fight Gets Bad Reviews