k wrote:
[ But he's doing it *for* the children. Right? To keep it from them? Or is it Jesus? ]

It was Jesus.

Was Jesus anti-pr0n? Before or after the thing with the prostitute?

Excuse my apparent ignorance but WHAT thing with the prostitute?

I say he's guilty of misuse of public money already and should be prosceuted himself.

Jesus is guily of misuse of public money? The dude has been dead for a while. I'm not too concerned about Roman tax fraud, anyway...

RE: law.com - U.S. Attorney's Porn Fight Gets Bad Reviews