Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

MemeStreams Discussion

search


This page contains all of the posts and discussion on MemeStreams referencing the following web page: Too Much Pork and Too Little Sugar - New York Times. You can find discussions on MemeStreams as you surf the web, even if you aren't a MemeStreams member, using the Threads Bookmarklet.

Too Much Pork and Too Little Sugar - New York Times
by Rattle at 7:44 pm EDT, Aug 10, 2005

Friedman checks in on the Energy Bill:

Sorry to be so cynical, but an energy bill that doesn't enjoin our auto companies to sharply improve their mileage standards is just not serious. This bill is what the energy expert Gal Luft calls "the sum of all lobbies." While it contains some useful provisions, it also contains massive pork slabs dished out to the vested interests who need them least - like oil companies - and has no overarching strategy to deal with the new world.

The White House? It blocked an amendment that would have required the president to find ways to cut oil use by one million barrels a day by 2015 - on the grounds that it might have required imposing better fuel economy on our carmakers.

Many technologies that could make a difference are already here - from hybrid engines to ethanol. All that is needed is a gasoline tax of $2 a gallon to get consumers and Detroit to change their behavior and adopt them. As Representative Edward Markey noted, auto fuel economy peaked at 26.5 miles per gallon in 1986, and "we've been going backward every since" - even though we have the technology to change that right now. "This is not rocket science," he rightly noted. "It's auto mechanics."

We do need to hold the auto manufactures' asses to the fire to get any change in this area. I can easily demonstrate why:

I am a typical American. I want a black Dodge Charger SRT8 with a 6.1L Hemi V-8 and all its massive crushing horsepower and torque. I want to pass traffic at 125-Mph in the right lane. I want people to hear the lyrics to Hang on St. Christopher, Highway Chile, Crosstown Traffic, Bad Habit, Novacane, and Search and Destroy spiking through their minds as my rumbling jet black road warrior speed machine glides by them at a pace all men both fear and lust after deep inside. When I hit the highway, I am the American Mad Max, and you best obey the golden rule of the highway, "Get the fuck out of the way".

I am more than willing to admit that I am part of "the problem" as I leave a trail of earth polluting fumes, shattered nerves, and glowing asphalt along the many links of the most wonderful Eisenhower Highway System. On this highway system, I am the worlds forgotten boy, the run away son of the nuclear a-bomb. The one who has already decided where they are going to be in 45 seconds and exactly how they are going to get there. Somebody has got to save my soul.

So look out honey, we best start using technology. My road-warror tendency is not a thing that can be defeated. It must be met head on and subverted with something other than high gas prices and speeding tickets. Where the hell is the HEV I'll settle for? Given gas prices and insurance costs, its clear a battle is already being waged against me, specifically. I must be pacified, I cannot be defeated. The United States must negotiate with my kind of terrorist. Its up to the auto industry to do it. With the right kind of economic concession, I might be willing to change my ways.


 
RE: Too Much Pork and Too Little Sugar - New York Times
by flynn23 at 10:08 am EDT, Aug 11, 2005

Rattle wrote:
Friedman checks in on the Energy Bill:

Sorry to be so cynical, but an energy bill that doesn't enjoin our auto companies to sharply improve their mileage standards is just not serious. This bill is what the energy expert Gal Luft calls "the sum of all lobbies." While it contains some useful provisions, it also contains massive pork slabs dished out to the vested interests who need them least - like oil companies - and has no overarching strategy to deal with the new world.

The White House? It blocked an amendment that would have required the president to find ways to cut oil use by one million barrels a day by 2015 - on the grounds that it might have required imposing better fuel economy on our carmakers.

Many technologies that could make a difference are already here - from hybrid engines to ethanol. All that is needed is a gasoline tax of $2 a gallon to get consumers and Detroit to change their behavior and adopt them. As Representative Edward Markey noted, auto fuel economy peaked at 26.5 miles per gallon in 1986, and "we've been going backward every since" - even though we have the technology to change that right now. "This is not rocket science," he rightly noted. "It's auto mechanics."

We do need to hold the auto manufactures' asses to the fire to get any change in this area. I can easily demonstrate why:

I am a typical American. I want a black Dodge Charger SRT8 with a 6.1L Hemi V-8 and all its massive crushing horsepower and torque. I want to pass traffic at 125-Mph in the right lane. I want people to hear the lyrics to Hang on St. Christopher, Highway Chile, Crosstown Traffic, Bad Habit, Novacane, and Search and Destroy spiking through their minds as my rumbling jet black road warrior speed machine glides by them at a pace all men both fear and lust after deep inside. When I hit the highway, I am the American Mad Max, and you best obey the golden rule of the highway, "Get the fuck out of the way".

I am more than willing to admit that I am part of "the problem" as I leave a trail of earth polluting fumes, shattered nerves, and glowing asphalt along the many links of the most wonderful Eisenhower Highway System. On this highway system, I am the worlds forgotten boy, the run away son of the nuclear a-bomb. The one who has already decided where they are going to be in 45 seconds and exactly ho... [ Read More (0.3k in body) ]


 
RE: Too Much Pork and Too Little Sugar - New York Times
by skullaria at 7:40 pm EDT, Aug 11, 2005

I think the bill sucks, and I just want to be able to afford to go to the library. I don't care if I drive a clunker with the muffler dragging as long as it is safe and dependable. I am so oblivous to the appeal of cars and trucks listening to my Learn a Language in Your Car CD's that I won't even notice if someone blows past me, as long as they don't hit me and make the CD skip.

Gettin to the library though - that is costin me 5.00 a trip now. Think I don't notice THAT? Now I would drive a little pinto if I had one, or a metrocar, but with the soccer-mom, baby on board mentality that ***I*** have, I'm scared one of the rabid HUMMERS around here will run me and the offspring right over. I've nearly been a victim of the same yellow one twice in my truck as it is.

No, I say screw the 'demand is up so the cost is up explanation' that I am forcefed by Fox News. I say "Elect an oil man president and see what we get. GO ahead, elect another one, damnit."

This kinda corporate pork and I can't afford to go to the freakin library is exactly what you get.

We need mass transit, and better technology NOW.


 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics