flynn23 wrote:

We may need to start a legal defense fund for Michael.

Yes, that may be necessary. However, I seriously hope that some entity with a hell of alot more money and power behind it than we have steps forward to help defend him.

I don't want to see a repeat of the Hoffman/Griffith story.

The thing that really gets me about these occurances, is how is this not equivalent to whistle blowing? I mean, if this was a disease or a terrorist threat that you had discovered and you published it or exposed it, you'd be lauded as a hero. But because there's technology involved, then you're a target and a criminal.

And it will be done in the name of "Protecting Intellectual Property"...

RE: Cisco hits back at flaw researcher