janelane wrote:
As soon as I read this article, I could not conceive of a logical reason for porn sites to register under the name. It costs a lot more, it makes it REALLY easy for ISPs, etc. to filter, and the subsequent loss of potential profits can't possibly be worth the incremental virtue of appearing kid protected.

Thats right. I figure this registrar is banking on a regulatory environment that forces porn sites to register in his tld, at a huge mark up.

RE: CNN.com - Stage set for '.xxx' Internet addresses - Jun 2, 2005