Decius wrote: ] ] I'm talking about this: http://techlist.org/slashdot.jpg. ] ] It's annoying, because I have to scroll through a whole page ] ] ] of those before I get to a comment. Why would I want to ] look ] ] at an entire page of links to the exact same thing, with no ] ] comments? Am I missing something? I often am! ] ] What you and Randy are both missing is that Memestreams is not ] a finished product. ] ] 1. There is no way for me to tell the difference between when ] someone simply links to a page and when someone provides a ] link along with commentary. The purpose of the threaded view ] is to allow you to find out what people are thinking about a ] particular link. I want all that information in one place, so ] that in the future when you are out in the internet and you ] click on the discussion bookmarklet you get everything that ] people are saying about a URL. ] ] 2. There are going to be hundreds of posts on each URL at some ] point in the future. It should be obvious that the current ] method of viewing the threads is temporary. There is a ] reputation system in MemeStreams for a reason. You will ] ultimately be able to sort the discussions for highly rated ] posts and posters just as you can on slashdot/kuro5hin, but ] based on a multi-higharchical reputation system instead of a ] mono-higharchical moderation oligarchy. ] ] 3. A lot of people are going to have very similar things to ] say about a url. There is no way that I can eliminate similar ] posts. The technology to do that properly simply does not ] exist, anywhere. The reputation system will allow you to ] filter threads for posts made by your highest ranked posters, ] the highest ranked posts in the thread, a hybrid view of ] those two, and for posts made after a certain timeframe. That ] should be more then effective at cutting the threads down to ] size. ] ] This is not in place right now because: ] ] 1. Writing code takes time. ] 2. I JUST posted the threading code a week ago. In most places ] this kind of capability isn't needed yet. ] 3. I wanted to get the discussion capability out before the ] presentation at phreaknic. I didn't want to hold it off for a ] month because I needed to work on this filtering capability. ] ] It will not be in place until I am able to get some of the ] database scalability fixed up. ] ] Yesterday Randy called me up all annoyed because he didn't ] think the discussion bookmarklet was in an "intuitive ] location." Look, I'm not stupid. I have previously stated that ] I cut a lot of corners to get the discussion code out before ] Phreaknic. There will be minor details that are not right. ] This isn't because I don't realise that they need to be ] different. This is because in the interest of time some things ] have been given a higher priority then other things. It's a great start of a great idea. Keep up the good work. RE: Quit Slashdot.org Today! |