] Yesterday I had another person comment to me that tags
] looked too like Meta keywords in html pages, and that
] we'd pretty much discarded those because they got spammed
] to death.
]...
] Imagine for a moment that Craigslist discards it's broken
] sucky category system and switches to a folksonomy....
] This will quickly degenerate in an escalating war of tag
] placement and destroy the folksonomy....
]
] # Maximum number of tags on a post. Well ok. But you
] could still do serious damage with 255 tags. So where's
] the limit?
] # Allow others to edit a posts tags. Won't this just
] stress the system as tag edit wars break out?
] # Allow others to add tags but give them less weight.
] Tricky to fine tune.
] # Combine with a reputation system that devalues people
] who tag spam. We're on a rising complexity curve here.
] # Administrator moderation. Adding a controlling human to
] the system is not going to work. We're back to librarians
] and site owner hate and it doesn't scale.
]
] What we need is some positive social feedback loops that
] denegrate bad tagging and reward good tagging.

Discussion on the means that the present folksonomies use to disrupt spamming, and where it could go. This isn't really a fear for the 'stream though. Complexity is already there.