| |
|
This page contains all of the posts and discussion on MemeStreams referencing the following web page: Source: FCC to dress 'naked' DSL. You can find discussions on MemeStreams as you surf the web, even if you aren't a MemeStreams member, using the Threads Bookmarklet.
|
Source: FCC to dress 'naked' DSL
by flynn23 at 12:07 pm EST, Mar 21, 2005 |
] Aside from users of naked DSL services, an FCC decision
] would also affect "cord-cutters," a group of about 20
] million U.S. residents who don't have local phone lines
] and go solo instead with their cell phones. As a result
] of the possible FCC ruling, cord-cutters would have to
] buy a local phone line in order to get DSL. FUCK THE FCC! This is a death blow to any CLEC or competitive DSL provider and is obviously pandering to the Bell Lobby. |
| |
RE: Source: FCC to dress 'naked' DSL
by IconoclasT at 7:28 pm EST, Mar 21, 2005 |
flynn23 wrote:
] ] Aside from users of naked DSL services, an FCC decision
] ] would also affect "cord-cutters," a group of about 20
] ] million U.S. residents who don't have local phone lines
] ] and go solo instead with their cell phones. As a result
] ] of the possible FCC ruling, cord-cutters would have to
] ] buy a local phone line in order to get DSL.
]
] FUCK THE FCC! This is a death blow to any CLEC or competitive
] DSL provider and is obviously pandering to the Bell Lobby. I'd like to see the original charter which founded the agency and compare it to their current place. The FCC has truly outlived its usefulness... |
|
Source: FCC to dress 'naked' DSL
by Decius at 12:43 pm EST, Mar 21, 2005 |
] Aside from users of naked DSL services, an FCC decision
] would also affect "cord-cutters," a group of about 20
] million U.S. residents who don't have local phone lines
] and go solo instead with their cell phones. As a result
] of the possible FCC ruling, cord-cutters would have to
] buy a local phone line in order to get DSL. When I moved to Georgia I was informed that I had to have a pots line to get DSL. I moved here after 2002. |
| |
RE: Source: FCC to dress 'naked' DSL
by flynn23 at 12:55 pm EST, Mar 22, 2005 |
Decius wrote:
] ] Aside from users of naked DSL services, an FCC decision
] ] would also affect "cord-cutters," a group of about 20
] ] million U.S. residents who don't have local phone lines
] ] and go solo instead with their cell phones. As a result
] ] of the possible FCC ruling, cord-cutters would have to
] ] buy a local phone line in order to get DSL.
]
] When I moved to Georgia I was informed that I had to have a
] pots line to get DSL. I moved here after 2002. The Georgia PUC is notorious for being in the hands of BellSouth (Corporate HQ located in Atlanta). Interestingly enough, you don't see a lot of BellSouth pilots or new product intros in GA. Most are in FL, SC, and TN, where the PUCs are more known for being anti-Bell. |
|
Source: FCC to dress 'naked' DSL
by k at 4:35 pm EST, Mar 21, 2005 |
] Aside from users of naked DSL services, an FCC decision
] would also affect "cord-cutters," a group of about 20
] million U.S. residents who don't have local phone lines
] and go solo instead with their cell phones. As a result
] of the possible FCC ruling, cord-cutters would have to
] buy a local phone line in order to get DSL. FUCK THE FCC! This is a death blow to any CLEC or competitive DSL provider and is obviously pandering to the Bell Lobby. [ I wonder if it'll have the net effect of driving people away from DSL altogether... granted, not everyone has choices in the matter, but for those that do, cable's a completely valid alternative. -k] |
|
|
