Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

MemeStreams Discussion

search


This page contains all of the posts and discussion on MemeStreams referencing the following web page: terms of impairment. You can find discussions on MemeStreams as you surf the web, even if you aren't a MemeStreams member, using the Threads Bookmarklet.

terms of impairment
by noteworthy at 7:38 am EST, Jan 13, 2015

Chris Betz:

Forces often seek to undermine and disrupt technology and people, attempting to weaken the very devices and services people have come to depend on and trust.

Molly Wood:

Think twice about what you connect to your network.

James Comey:

My goal is to urge our fellow citizens to participate in a conversation as a country about where we are, and where we want to be, with respect to the authority of law enforcement.

David Cameron:

In our country, do we want to allow a means of communication between people which ... we cannot read?

David Cole:

It is disappointing, if not surprising, that they see a need for public debate only when new technologies may impair their ability to monitor us, and not when such technologies enhance their monitoring.

Poul-Henning Kamp:

The reason HTTP/2.0 does not improve privacy is that the big corporate backers have built their business model on top of the lack of privacy.

Maciej Ceglowski:

Surveillance as a business model is the only thing that makes a site like Facebook possible.

Metafilter Wisdom:

If you are not paying for it, you're not the customer; you're the product being sold.

Steven Johns:

Gogo Inflight Internet seems to believe that they are justified in performing a man-in-the-middle attack on their users. It was [recently] revealed through the FCC that Gogo partnered with government officials to produce "capabilities to accommodate law enforcement interests" that go beyond those outlined under federal law.


 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics