|
This page contains all of the posts and discussion on MemeStreams referencing the following web page: its power seems inescapable. You can find discussions on MemeStreams as you surf the web, even if you aren't a MemeStreams member, using the Threads Bookmarklet.
|
its power seems inescapable by noteworthy at 3:06 pm EST, Nov 23, 2014 |
Ursula K. LeGuin: We live in capitalism, its power seems inescapable -- but then, so did the divine right of kings. Any human power can be resisted and changed by human beings. Resistance and change often begin in art. Very often in our art, the art of words.
Brendan Nyhan: [That's] the problem with rumors -- they're often much more interesting than the truth. The challenge for fact-checkers, it seems, is to make the facts as fun to share as the myths they seek to replace.
David Jakubowski, Facebook's head of advertising technology: We are bringing all of the people-based marketing functions that marketers are used to doing on Facebook and allowing them to do that across the web.
David Brooks: Data-driven politics assumes that demography is destiny, that the electorate is not best seen as a group of free-thinking citizens but as a collection of demographic slices. This method assumes that mobilization is more important than persuasion; that it is more important to target your likely supporters than to try to reframe debates or persuade the whole country.
Decius: It's important to understand that it isn't Congress that must change -- it is us.
Lawrence D. Freedman: In the end, the lesson of 1914 is that there are no sure lessons. Yet there are always choices, and the best advice for governments to emerge from the story of 1914 is to make them carefully: be clear about core interests, get the best possible information, explore opportunities for a peaceful settlement, and treat military plans with skepticism.
Randall Munroe: Is there an app for that?
|
|
RE: its power seems inescapable by Decius at 8:13 pm EST, Nov 23, 2014 |
David Brooks: Data-driven politics assumes that demography is destiny, that the electorate is not best seen as a group of free-thinking citizens but as a collection of demographic slices. This method assumes that mobilization is more important than persuasion; that it is more important to target your likely supporters than to try to reframe debates or persuade the whole country.
Good observations. I agree that there was a soullessness to these campaigns. At least they care what voters are interested in, which means its not totally orchestrated. But they don't want to lead, just sell. They assume the buyers don't really understand the product and there is no point in trying to educate them about it. |
|
|
|