| |
|
This page contains all of the posts and discussion on MemeStreams referencing the following web page: Another anti-court bill. You can find discussions on MemeStreams as you surf the web, even if you aren't a MemeStreams member, using the Threads Bookmarklet.
|
Another anti-court bill
by Decius at 12:03 am EST, Nov 5, 2004 |
] The Congress may, if two thirds of each House agree,
] reverse a judgment of the United States Supreme Court--
]
] (1) if that judgment is handed down after the date of the
] enactment of this Act; and
]
] (2) to the extent that judgment concerns the
] constitutionality of an Act of Congress. Once again, these changes can only be accomplished by Constitutional amendment. Not by passing a law. This proposal would make Congress, and not the Constitution, the ultimate arbiter of law. It has 26 cosponsors. |
| |
RE: Another anti-court bill
by Mike the Usurper at 2:08 am EST, Nov 5, 2004 |
Decius wrote:
] ] The Congress may, if two thirds of each House agree,
] ] reverse a judgment of the United States Supreme Court--
] ]
] ] (1) if that judgment is handed down after the date of the
] ] enactment of this Act; and
] ]
] ] (2) to the extent that judgment concerns the
] ] constitutionality of an Act of Congress.
]
] Once again, these changes can only be accomplished by
] Constitutional amendment. Not by passing a law. This proposal
] would make Congress, and not the Constitution, the ultimate
] arbiter of law. It has 26 cosponsors. So there are at least 26 people in Congress with no understanding of the Constitution. You seem surprised? |
|
|
|
