k wrote:
] Vile wrote:
] ] I don't think that tolerating homosexuals is any more
] required
] ] than tolerating racists. See, one does not choose their
] race,
] ] but they do choose their sexual preference. Anyway gays
] want
] ] more than tolerance, they want blanket acceptance. That is
] ] wrong. Not everyone will accept them and that is an
] ] individuals perogative. Its what makes america great. That
]
] ] some folks can be gay and others can despise them.
]
] [ Certainly, i have no right to say that another person can't
] think that homosexuality is wrong, any more than I can enjoin
] someone from disliking blacks or asians. What I feel I can do
] is hold people to having a rational explanation for their
] opinions. And "It's immoral." isn't an explanation, it's an
] evasion... one that lots of people happily spout off. I
] haven't yet heard a convincing argument against homosexuality
] that doesn't amount, essentially, to "Ewwwww!" and I don't
] really expect to. Maybe it'll happen. Until then, it's just
] hate, bred of ignorance and intellectual rigidity, and that's
] something I have no compunction opposing. -k]

You resemble my point, kid. Nothing you said there has any validity beyond your own self-made philosophy. There are no facts you can use to back this argument. You obviously didnt even try. Just shut up sometimes. No one wants you monopolizing the main page with hysteria culled from the fringe. At least I was only responding.

RE: Salon.com News | 'Homosexuals are hellbound!'