k wrote:
] Vile wrote:

FOR ONE, I didn't write any of this. You did!~ So, what the hell is that "]Vile wrote:" thing doing on the top of the page! Goddam, you lazy bastard! Erase that shit! Make some sense, goddammit!-----Vile

] [ Given that your stated goal is to disrupt us as much as
] possible, I typically ignore everything you say, even when it
] has merit, which it frequently does, in between the ad
] hominems and bile. But this reply exceeds even my tolerance
] for insult and faulty logic.

I don't disrupt as much as possible. I represent. Get that straight, k-hole.

]
] You claim that I'm so rabid in my hatred for bush that I would
] respond with unchecked vitriol and fury were the situation
] reversed. That I am, in fact, unable to think rationally
] about the president. You clearly believe this of me with the
] very same unreasoned passion you ascribe to me, so I imagine
] argument isn't likely to have an effect. Still, I do defend
] that I would treat this rule as dumb regardless of the target.
] You may, happily, continue to think otherwise since it can't
] be *proven* either way.

Yes, but what can be proven you prove yourself later on in this post, k. See, You cannot think rationally about the president and you say it yourself in so many words in two paragraphs or so. Watch. I will point it out.
]
] I'm neither fanatical nor obsessive about John Kerry. I don't
] particularly like the guy, but I think he'll do a
] substantially better job than Bush, period. I have never
] pretended to be anything but accepting of Kerry as the nominee
] and support him precicely insofar as he is not Bush. I'd love
] to have better options than "not Bush", but I've only got one,
] and Kerry's it, so I favor him.

Whooops! It was actually the next paragraph. Silly me. You contradicted yourself from paragh one to paragraph two. Why would you do this? It doesn't make sense. Are you sure you are okay, k?
]
] Really, you don't get insipid until the second section where
] you imply that my argument is without merit, and that my right
] to exist is questionable.

Well, isn't it? I mean, look at yourself. A grown man, Being a Kerry cheerleader and leading us to a bloodsoaked draft situation with your pseudoliberalism. Can you not fathom mankind's desire to question your viability as an asset to existence itself? Surely you must be more reasonable here, k.

As if that silly threat weren't
] enough, you claim you'll leave it at that, and then don't,
] dribbling on and completely misunderstanding the simple
] concept of trust.

I understand the concept of trust, because it has been both proven to me and broken to me, and both concepts involved you, in fact. See, you make me trust the collective stupidity of mankind. Conversely, you make me distrust God for making such an utter piece of shit such as yourself.

In fact, what I said was, I don't think we
] need written rules to proscribe the President and candidate
] from "cheating." These men should be honest enough not to
] cheat without a proctor leaning over them with a copy of the
] rulebook. So, in fact, my argument is precicely that
] dishonest men have no business being on the podium. It is,
] actually in *no* sense, the converse argument you claim it to
] be.

The was not what you actually said, though. You said the converse of that. That is why I knew that you were deserving of a good talking to. Say what you mean and mean what you say, my friend. That is a good concept for you. Tonight, you ought to get a notebook and write in it, one hundred times, Say what you mean and mean what you say. Okay, k?

]
] Presumably the remainder of the slander you spew is supposed
] to convince someone of something, or perhaps you're simply
] fullfilling your promise to be the local troll.

Are you aware of how homosexual you seem when you use the word "troll?" Just wondering. It's a faggy word, pal.

If I thought
] you knew even half enough about me to honestly mean any one of
] those asisne things, I might take them seriously, but as it
] is, I don't mind when people marginalize themselves further
] with half sentient rants.

See, there you go. You are an open book, k. There are some things I can just glean from your posts. you are a philistine and a plebe. Please never stop being a career student. Don't live. I don't think you can handle it.

I'm glad you've managed to slough
] off all the blame for society's ills on "middle-class,
] apathetic, cynical, pseudo-intellectuals" and I can only hope
] it fills you with all the joy and hope you deserve as a great
] paragon of virtue. -k]

And I still hope you invent a time machine, bring a coathanger and meet your mom two months before the day you were born.

RE: DRUDGE REPORT 2004: Did Kerry Cheat?