|
Protect Consumers, or Big Business? by Jeremy at 11:59 am EDT, Aug 1, 2004 |
Apparently, the FDA, along with the president, functions on a plane where errors are not made and judgments and decisions never need to be revisited. For those of us who see questioning and constant re-evaluation as essential to progress of any kind, this is one more frightening reminder that our administration is taking us down the wrong road at ever increasing speed. |
|
RE: Protect Consumers, or Big Business? by Vile at 8:21 pm EDT, Aug 2, 2004 |
Jeremy wrote: ] Apparently, the FDA, along with the president, functions on ] a plane where errors are not made and judgments and decisions ] never need to be revisited. ] ] For those of us who see questioning and constant ] re-evaluation as essential to progress of any kind, this ] is one more frightening reminder that our administration is ] taking us down the wrong road at ever increasing speed. What are you recommending? A NYT news story? Wow, talk about fringe. Waste of time, here. Jeremy, didn't they tell you this is a recommendation site. I wasn't aware that this is a news site! Google does it better. |
|
| |
RE: Protect Consumers, or Big Business? by Jeremy at 1:03 am EDT, Aug 3, 2004 |
Vile wrote: ] What are you recommending? I'm recommending that you read the text I quoted. Nothing more. Whether or not you click through is of secondary importance. The idea should stand on its own, more or less independent of the article in which it appeared. It appears that you read it, or at least looked at it long enough to reply. Mission accomplished. |
|
| | |
RE: Protect Consumers, or Big Business? by Vile at 2:30 am EDT, Aug 3, 2004 |
Jeremy wrote: ] Vile wrote: ] ] What are you recommending? ] ] I'm recommending that you read the text I quoted. Nothing ] more. Whether or not you click through is of secondary ] importance. The idea should stand on its own, more or less ] independent of the article in which it appeared. ] ] It appears that you read it, or at least looked at it long ] enough to reply. Mission accomplished. I couldn't read the article, because the New York Times requires that you register an account with them. Well, FUCK them. How do I know they won't pull something funny? I don't. So, I figured yo ucould give me the gist, as it were, of the article. you failed to do this. I wanted to know what this was in relation to. the only thing you told us was that the government sided with big business as if this is some kind of big news. did you think the FDA was here to be a buddy to you and I? They let us drink shitty milk, and eat geneticallymodified things everydaywithout conscience. then they won't allow you to advertise that vitamin C has some benefits. the FDA is a crappy thing, but you did not tell me what kind of shenanigans they are up to now. you were vague. Thank you for recommending me junk. Have some manners next time,tyke. |
|
Protect Consumers, or Big Business? by Vile at 2:58 am EDT, Aug 3, 2004 |
Jeremy, your writing matches your coding in terms of sucking! please be specific! You fucking scriptkiddie.Apparently, the FDA, along with the president, functions on a plane where errors are not made and judgments and decisions never need to be revisited. For those of us who see questioning and constant re-evaluation as essential to progress of any kind, this is one more frightening reminder that our administration is taking us down the wrong road at ever increasing speed. |
|
|