bucy wrote:
] ] This Act may be cited as the `Controlling the
] ] Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of
] ] 2003', or the `CAN-SPAM Act of 2003'.
]
] I'm not sure if this was blogged here before. In addition
] to prohibiting sending SPAM, it also expressly (sec 6)
] prohibits
] you from promoting your business via spam, i.e. if you hire
] spammers, you're also in violation of the act. This seems
] like
] it could be a more fruitful avenue of enforcement -- prosecute
]
] the end-users of the "spam service" rather than the spammers
] themselves.

This is the only way to go. Unfortunately this law also bans anonymous business transactions, such as services run behind remailers.

RE: CAN-SPAM Act Text