oaknet wrote:

]
] What an interesting set of non sequiturs! My point was simple
] - anger drives people to insane, appalling extremes - this man
] and his "tank", 9/11, Palestinian suicide bombers. But you
] call it "cool". How quaint.
]
] The suicide tank, you say, was "pretty cool", despite the loss
] of life (yes, the life of the man who made it - or doesn't he
] "count"?) What age are you to think that his insane, suicidal
] stunt was anything more than a miserable example of anger let
] loose? Dead men are "cool"? What is your measure of human life
] - toy soldiers?

Actually, religion and politics plays somewhat of a larger role than meerly Just anger in the case Palestinian suicide bombers and Al Quadia networks. This guy was not on a jihad of any kind, he was plainly fucking nuts. "his insane, suicidal stunt was anything more than a miserable example of anger let loose?" That's pretty much all it was. Pretending it was something it wasn't makes no sense at all. Spilt milk is not international terrorism.
His tank was cool and unique.
As far as the loss of life , I personally don't see this guy as a victim (he did it himself, afterall) - If you apply your own idiotic analogy (9/11) to this case, I think its sort of interesting that you would count the terrorists among the "losses."

RE: CNN.com - Armed Bulldozer Rampage