dmv wrote: ] ] Many companies are quickly coming to realize this, as you ] ] can see from the impressive customer list on MySQL's ] ] website. I'm sure that most readers have used the Yahoo! ] ] (Nasdaq: YHOO) Finance site on many occasions (like ] ] perhaps this one), but would probably be surprised to ] ] learn that even Yahoo!'s massive source of data is fed ] ] from MySQL databases. Is this another "worse is better"/Linux vs BSD phenomenon? From what anyone's ever told me, Postgresql is a much better DBMS in several regards: 1. fine-grained locking -- much more scalable when doing many concurrent INSERTs or UPDATEs in the same table. 2. Beter/real transaction management. I guess many web-based workloads are almost all SELECT ... in which case MySQL wins since its optimized purely for that... |